2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06133.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of ductal carcinoma in situ according to Van Nuys Prognostic Index in Australia and New Zealand

Abstract: Significant differences in the management of DCIS according to VNPI groups were observed. The results suggest the possibility that some patients in the low-risk group were over-treated, while a proportion of patients in the intermediate- and high-risk groups were under-treated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, most recurrences were in the intermediate risk group who received postoperative RT. As in other studies, we observed no “RT-effect” in our low risk group (Lee et al 2013; Whitfield et al 2012; Asjoe et al 2007). Contrary to previous findings, no “RT-effect” was observed in our intermediate risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, most recurrences were in the intermediate risk group who received postoperative RT. As in other studies, we observed no “RT-effect” in our low risk group (Lee et al 2013; Whitfield et al 2012; Asjoe et al 2007). Contrary to previous findings, no “RT-effect” was observed in our intermediate risk group.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Attempts to validate the VNPI scoring system have yielded mixed results (MacAusland et al 2007; Di Saverio et al 2008; Gilleard et al 2008; Altintas et al 2011; Lee et al 2013; Whitfield et al 2012; Asjoe et al 2007). Such studies have had uneven population distributions, with most patients having low to intermediate scores.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Physicians surveyed in England and the United States indicated that explaining DCIS and justifying treatment to women were difficult [ 9 , 10 ]. Other studies found variation in the language clinicians used to describe DCIS, with many referring to it as cancer, and variation in treatment patterns [ 11 , 12 ]. Women with DCIS worldwide have reported suboptimal communication, poor health care experiences, and adverse health outcomes [ 13 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This system has been confirmed as a good prognosis factor by a recent cohort study of 4578 patients diagnosed with DCIS enrolled by Whitfield and al. [4].…”
Section: Surgery and Radiotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%