Management of collaborative research: collaboration and exploitation under the UK's information engineering advanced technology programme

Buisseret, Timothy J; Cameron, Hugh

doi:10.1080/09537329408524165

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To guide teams in these discussions and to allow for comparisons of similarities and differences between disciplines and the range of shared academic control and contribution, the following questions may be useful (Bammer, 2008;Bryan et al, 2002;Buisseret, 1994;Choi & Pak, 2007;Jeffrey, 2003;Rogers-Dilon, 2005). • How is research quality evaluated in my discipline?…”

Section: Implications For Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping disciplinary differences and equity of academic control to create a space for collaboration

Siemens¹,

Yin²,

Smith³

2014

CJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academics are collaborating more as their research questions are becoming more complex, often reaching beyond the capacity of any one person. However, in many parts of the campus, teamwork is not a traditional work pattern, and team members may not understand the best ways to work together to the benefit of the project. Challenges are particularly possible when there are differences among the disciplines represented on a team and when there are variations in academic control over decision making and research direction setting. Disparities in these two dimensions create potential for miscommunication, conflict, and other negative consequences, which may mean that a collaboration is not successful. This paper explores these dimensions and suggests a space for collaboration; it also describes some benefits and challenges associated within various positions within the framework. Academic teams can use this tool to determine the place they would like to occupy within the collaboration space and structure themselves accordingly before undertaking research.

show abstract

Section: Implications For Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping disciplinary differences and equity of academic control to create a space for collaboration

Siemens¹,

Yin²,

Smith³

2014

CJHE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This has pervasive effects on different levels of activity in scientific research and discovery, from discovery itself in laboratory research, the exploitation of research findings in R&D projects, to strategies in intercorporate alliances. Internet-based communication has proliferated and provided the means for engaging in new knowledge creating-interactions among researchers at the level of the research project as well as at the level of institutions and international collaborative arrangements (Buisseret & Cameron, 1994;Krü ck, 1995;Powell et al, 1996;Zucker et al, 1996). These new developments require knowledge-intensive companies, research organizations, and research facilities to have permanent access to computational capabilities and research communication networks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Genomics, ICT and the formation of R&D networks

Groenewegen

Wouters

2004

New Genetics and Society

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

and-conditions-of-access.pdf This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution , reselling , loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

show abstract