2002
DOI: 10.1007/s10016-001-0106-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of Carotid Body Paragangliomas and Review of a 30-year Experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
215
1
25

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
215
1
25
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be attributed to adequate collateral circulation through circle of Willis. If the clamping period is less than 10 min, the risk of developing neurological damage is very low as per Patetsis et al [17]. Temporary balloon occlusion of the carotid artery to assess the adequacy of collateral circulation across the circle of Willis can be done at the time of carotid angiography [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be attributed to adequate collateral circulation through circle of Willis. If the clamping period is less than 10 min, the risk of developing neurological damage is very low as per Patetsis et al [17]. Temporary balloon occlusion of the carotid artery to assess the adequacy of collateral circulation across the circle of Willis can be done at the time of carotid angiography [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As discussed by Patetsios et al in 2002 and Marzo et al in 1997 with regard to both functional and nonfunctional PGL of the head and neck, radiographic observation with or without the use of RT is the treatment mainstay for the elderly or severely infirm. 15,16 Embolization and long-term therapeutic use of α/β-blockers would seem to be a legitimate method of symptomatic treatment in nonsurgical candidates with functional PGL, but little evidence is available to support this strategy outside of preparation for surgical excision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При больших опухолях (IV тип) данное вмешательство сопряжено с высоким риском возникновения эмболических осложнений [12,14,19,20,22,25,28]. Ряд авторов [13,17,29,31,32,34,35] считают, что после эмболизации происходит асептическое воспаление адвентиции, в результате чего во время операции невозможно субадвентици-ально выделить артерии от опухоли и сохранить целостность артерии, поэтому они отказываются от проведения эмболиза-ции. В связи с этим в приведенных наблюдениях мы не выпол-няли предварительную эмболизацию сосудов, питающих опу-холь.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified