2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a large single-center study to assess predictors of malignancy and long-term outcomes

Abstract: Background and Aims: Management of branch-duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BDIPMNs) remains challenging. We determined factors associated with malignancy in BD-IPMNs and longterm outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Of these studies, 33 investigated mural nodules5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 21 examined dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD)7 9, 15 16, 18 21, 23 26, 27 30, 32 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 21 analysed cyst size5 7, 8, 9 14, 15 18, 20 23, 25 27, 28 31, 36 38, 40 41, 43 47, 48, 49, 17 assessed CA19‐9 increase…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Of these studies, 33 investigated mural nodules5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 21 examined dilatation of the main pancreatic duct (MPD)7 9, 15 16, 18 21, 23 26, 27 30, 32 36, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 21 analysed cyst size5 7, 8, 9 14, 15 18, 20 23, 25 27, 28 31, 36 38, 40 41, 43 47, 48, 49, 17 assessed CA19‐9 increase…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients who have "worrisome features" and additional high-risk signs should also undergo resection, while patients with "worrisome features" alone should receive careful follow-up. The "high-risk stigmata" of IPMNs that can be detected by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) are an enhancing solid component inside the cyst and dilation of the main pancreatic duct (>10 mm) [3,[8][9][10][11] . Additional high-risk signs among the "worrisome features" are a definite mural nodule and suspected main duct involvement [12,13] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most recent international consensus guidelines (ICG 2012) used clinical and imaging findings based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to classify pancreatic cysts into those with “high-risk stigmata”, “worrisome features”, or “low-risk” (3). These guidelines recommend surgical intervention for cases with “high-risk stigmata” while those with “worrisome features” should be further evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)(6). These guidelines are effective, but still some patients who undergo pancreatic resection for a cyst with “worrisome features” (such as a history of pancreatitis, a cyst size of ≥30 mm, a thickened cyst wall, or a non-enhancing mural nodule) will have a lesion with little or no malignant potential (such as IPMNs with low-grade dysplasia or an SCN thought preoperatively to be mucinous neoplasm) (7, 8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%