2018
DOI: 10.1108/pijpsm-11-2016-0164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management-level officers’ experiences with the Ferguson effect

Abstract: Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the factors associated with management-level officers’ sensitivity to various manifestations of the “Ferguson effect.” Design/methodology/approach A survey was administered to police officers attending an advanced training institute in the Southeastern USA in the fall of 2015. Specifically, a series of items first inquired about negative attitudes attributable to deadly force incidents throughout the country, followed by items tapping into theoretically relevan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the importance of citizen cooperation is a quite well-established element in researchers' understanding of crime clearance, the Ferguson effect and its kin remain controversial. Studies such as Pyrooz et al (2016), Shjarback et al (2017), and Rosenfeld and Wallman (2019) did not find Ferguson-type effects on crime rates, and evidence for effects on officers' attitudes is mixed and contingent on other police agency factors Nix & Pickett, 2017;Nix & Wolfe, 2018).…”
Section: Police Violence and Crime Clearancementioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the importance of citizen cooperation is a quite well-established element in researchers' understanding of crime clearance, the Ferguson effect and its kin remain controversial. Studies such as Pyrooz et al (2016), Shjarback et al (2017), and Rosenfeld and Wallman (2019) did not find Ferguson-type effects on crime rates, and evidence for effects on officers' attitudes is mixed and contingent on other police agency factors Nix & Pickett, 2017;Nix & Wolfe, 2018).…”
Section: Police Violence and Crime Clearancementioning
confidence: 94%
“…(2016), Shjarback et al. (2017), and Rosenfeld and Wallman (2019) did not find Ferguson‐type effects on crime rates, and evidence for effects on officers’ attitudes is mixed and contingent on other police agency factors (Nix & Wolfe, 2016; Nix & Pickett, 2017; Nix & Wolfe, 2018).…”
Section: Police Violence and Crime Clearancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Our findings showed that police commanders who have quality relationships with their colleagues were significantly more likely to support organizational justice. This result adds to the growing body of empirical evidence demonstrating that officers' perceptions of their relationships with colleagues play an important role in predicting beneficial work-related outcomes (Nix & Wolfe, 2017aTankebe, 2014a). Bottoms and Tankebe's (2012) dialogic model of legitimacy may help broaden our understanding of this relationship.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For example, McCluskey, Terrill, and Paoline (2005) found that officers working in peer groups that valued aggressive patrol were more likely to base their decisions to use coercion on extralegal reasons such as the gender, class, or demeanor of a suspect (see also, Ingram, Paoline, & Terrill, 2013). A more recent study explicitly concerned with police managers found that those who reported greater attachment to their peers were less likely to maintain attitudes attributable to the “Ferguson Effect” (Nix & Wolfe, 2017a). It seems likely that there is also a peer effect with respect to police managers’ support for organizational justice.…”
Section: Other Factors Related To Support For Organizational Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…violent crime) those activities were meant to protect against. Studies have shown evidence of Ferguson Effects in the attitudes and actions of officers (drops in productivity, reduced motivation, belief crime will rise as officers "depolice"), though this effect was moderated by their belief in whether communities afford legitimacy to policing (Nix and Wolfe 2018). In contrast, the evidence for increases in negative crime outcomes after de-policing is mixed, confounded by income inequality and racial segregation (Gross and Mann 2017).…”
Section: Law Enforcement Discretion Priorities and Disparitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%