2001
DOI: 10.17487/rfc3055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management Information Base for the PINT Services Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(In fact, the existence of a MIB specification is a necessary condition for a protocol to advance in the IETF from a proposed standard to a draft standard. The PINT Working Group has been reviewing a standards-track Internet draft, 13 which is a candidate for the PINT MIB RFC. This document specifies a MIB module compliant with SMI Version 2.…”
Section: The Pint Mibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(In fact, the existence of a MIB specification is a necessary condition for a protocol to advance in the IETF from a proposed standard to a draft standard. The PINT Working Group has been reviewing a standards-track Internet draft, 13 which is a candidate for the PINT MIB RFC. This document specifies a MIB module compliant with SMI Version 2.…”
Section: The Pint Mibmentioning
confidence: 99%