1987
DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1987.tb01022.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and Size Economies in the England and Wales Dairy Sector

Abstract: Analyses of size economies in the England and Wales dairy sector have generally been made on the basis of comparisons of input‐output measures. These measures have been classified according to input use and farm size and have led to conclusions about efficiency and structural change. This paper examines the influence of managerial ability on economies of size using econometrically estimated long‐run average cost (LAC) functions from Milk Marketing Board data for 1980/1. The results show that the LAC curve is U… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent statistical studies (Dawson & Hubbard, 1987;Mukhtar & Dawson, 1990) on the nature of long-run average costs (LAC) in the England and Wales milk sector suggest a U-shaped curve, but one that is skewed to exhibit much greater economies than diseconomies as output is increased. In effect, this places the curve somewhere between the U-shape of traditional theory and the L-shape of 'modern' theory.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent statistical studies (Dawson & Hubbard, 1987;Mukhtar & Dawson, 1990) on the nature of long-run average costs (LAC) in the England and Wales milk sector suggest a U-shaped curve, but one that is skewed to exhibit much greater economies than diseconomies as output is increased. In effect, this places the curve somewhere between the U-shape of traditional theory and the L-shape of 'modern' theory.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, two LAC functions were estimated using cross-section MMB data for 1984/85. The first was a translog function (after Dawson & Hubbard, 1987); the second was a reciprocal function, to allow for the possibility of continuously falling average costs. 8 The two specifications provided almost identical fits to the data.…”
Section: Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Be that as it may, one needs to be alert to the pitfalls of attempting to derive the shape of the LAC curve based on a two-dimensional scatter plot that does not take into account the vital influence that management exerts on production and thus on the attendant costs. This cautionary note is echoed by Dawson and Hubbard (1987) in the dairy industry in England, and Hubbard et al (2007) in the oilseed rape production in England. It is axiomatic that better managerial acumen enables a farmer to produce any given output at a lower cost, and it should be realised that each point on the scatter plot shown in Figure 4 typifies a given level of managerial ability and/or practice.…”
Section: Figure 3: Variable Fixed and Total Cost Curvesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Following the approach adopted by Hubbard et al (2007), this could be done by relating average cost to actual output, but it is more appropriate to relate average cost to planned output, on the basis that costs are more likely to reflect what the farmer expects output to be (Hubbard et al, 2007;Dawson & Hubbard, 1987). As a result, a pragmatic two-step procedure will be adopted.…”
Section: Conceptualisation Estimation and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite its importance, it has been absent from the production, generating the ''management bias'' (Griliches, 1957). Several studies have appeared in the literature for the control of management efforts; they include the adoption of proxies (Dawson and Hubbard, 1985;Mefford, 1986), covariance analysis, which controls for the effect of time-invariant management, by eliminating it from the estimating equation (Mundlak, 1961), and data envelopment analysis (DEA) with a three-stage analysis (Avkiran and Rowlands, 2008). Recently, Alvarez et al (2004) proposed to handle this problem as an unobservable input, which can be recovered from the estimate function under certain hypothesis about the relationship between managerial ability and conventional inputs.…”
Section: Management Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%