2003
DOI: 10.1111/1472-9296.00088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and Resistance in the Convict Work Gangs, 1788-1830

Abstract: T he present paper examines the evolution of the management of the labour process within the male convict gang system. The organisation of convicts into discrete and enduring collective work units was a vital and productive part of the colonial economy and of the convict labour process generally. In providing a detailed account of the history of management's adoption of labour process structures and strategies the present paper shows that some of these were determined by changing management objectives while ot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his review of recent labour history relevant to the convict system, David Roberts highlights a series of essays by Bill Robbins (2000Robbins ( , 2003Robbins ( , 2004Robbins ( , 2005Robbins ( , 2009 which examine convict work and work relations and focus on 'the ways convict labour was organized, managed and experienced and how it changed over time' (Roberts 2011:45). In his review of recent labour history relevant to the convict system, David Roberts highlights a series of essays by Bill Robbins (2000Robbins ( , 2003Robbins ( , 2004Robbins ( , 2005Robbins ( , 2009 which examine convict work and work relations and focus on 'the ways convict labour was organized, managed and experienced and how it changed over time' (Roberts 2011:45).…”
Section: Convict Historical Research Since 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In his review of recent labour history relevant to the convict system, David Roberts highlights a series of essays by Bill Robbins (2000Robbins ( , 2003Robbins ( , 2004Robbins ( , 2005Robbins ( , 2009 which examine convict work and work relations and focus on 'the ways convict labour was organized, managed and experienced and how it changed over time' (Roberts 2011:45). In his review of recent labour history relevant to the convict system, David Roberts highlights a series of essays by Bill Robbins (2000Robbins ( , 2003Robbins ( , 2004Robbins ( , 2005Robbins ( , 2009 which examine convict work and work relations and focus on 'the ways convict labour was organized, managed and experienced and how it changed over time' (Roberts 2011:45).…”
Section: Convict Historical Research Since 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A further trajectory in recent convict historical research has been analyses of convict labour in particular works situations. In his review of recent labour history relevant to the convict system, David Roberts highlights a series of essays by Bill Robbins (2000Robbins ( , 2003Robbins ( , 2004Robbins ( , 2005Robbins ( , 2009 which examine convict work and work relations and focus on 'the ways convict labour was organized, managed and experienced and how it changed over time' (Roberts 2011:45). Roberts notes that Robbins' essays explore how convicts influenced their employment conditions, versus the tactics adopted by the state and employers to control labour and maximize output.…”
Section: Convict Historical Research Since 2001mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All convicts knew the risks associated with not bending their backs for the colonial state or private masters (Maxwell-Stewart, 2016: 417). However, not all work performed in penal stations and others sites of punishment was unskilled (Maxwell-Stewart, 1997; Robbins, 2000, 2003; Roberts and Garland, 2010). The extent to which the convict administrators experimented with different forms of production and labour extraction, and the impact that this had on the operation of the convict system as a whole and the subsequent lives of those who laboured in these environments, remains largely untested.…”
Section: The Historiography Of Convict Labourmentioning
confidence: 99%