2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Management and disclosure of quality issues in forensic science: A survey of current practice in Australia and New Zealand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Australian academia has taken and continues to take an active role in shaping the future of forensic science [ 26 ] and its management [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: The Australian Forensic Science Industry – the Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian academia has taken and continues to take an active role in shaping the future of forensic science [ 26 ] and its management [ 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: The Australian Forensic Science Industry – the Ecosystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of standardized language or categorization systems for issues detected within forensic science quality management systems makes comparison and analysis of this data enormously challenging. New research from within the field is investigating an evidence-based approach to addressing this task with the aim of developing a standardized system for categorization to facilitate data sharing and analysis [ 30 ]. A standardized approach can support the development of an enhanced, transparent reporting culture for issues detected within and across forensic science service providers to improve understandings of error, and transparency in error detection and quality control.…”
Section: Credibility In Forensic Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%