Management accounting practices, governing boards and competitive advantage of Ugandan secondary schools

Abstract

Purpose-This paper reports on the results of a study carried out to determine the use of Management Accounting Practices (MAPR) in Ugandan secondary schools. The study also sought to determine whether MAPR and governing boards (board size, gender diversity and frequency of board meetings) influence the perceived competitive advantage. Design/methodology/approach-This study is cross-sectional and correlational. Data were collected through a questionnaire survey of 200 secondary schools. The data was analysed through ordinary least squares regression using Statistical Package for Social Scientists. Findings-There are wide variations in MAP in terms of the extent to which the schools employ management accounting techniques. Also, MAP and governing boards have a predictive force on the schools' competitive advantage. However, governing board's size has no effect on competitive advantage. In terms of the control variables, the results suggest that while government school ownership has a positive effect on competitive advantage, the school's size has no effect. There are intertwining relationships of frequency of board meetings, board size and school size. Result limitations/Implications-The present study was limited to the secondary schools in Uganda which limits generalizability. Still, the results offer important implications for secondary schools' governing boards, owners and for similar African governments who are a major stakeholder in the secondary school education system. The exact mechanism by which intertwining relationships of frequency of board meetings, board size and school size impact competitive advantage is not been explored in this paper. Future researchers may direct research effort in this endeavour. Originality/Value-To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate use of MAPR in secondary schools and to provide evidence of their efficacy.

Audit committee effectiveness, isomorphic forces, managerial attitude and adoption of international financial reporting standards

“…According to Tusiime et al (2011), ownership structure is positively associated with performance of firms. Further, Nkundabanyanga et al (2018) found that ownership is positively associated with competitive advantage of a firm. For capital structure, increased debts in a firm increases monitoring costs (Bekiaris et al , 2014; Jensen and Meckling, 1976) since shareholders want to be aware on how debt finances have been utilized or invested (see Table II for variable measurement).…”

Determinants of adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards in Ugandan micro finance institutions

“…Tusiime et al (2011) found that ownership structure is positively associated with performance of firms. Further, Nkundabanyanga et al (2018) found that ownership is positively associated with competitive advantage of a firm. For capital structure, increased debts in a firm increase monitoring costs (Bekiaris et al , 2014; Jensen and Meckling, 1976) since shareholders desire to remain informed on how debt finances have been utilized or invested.…”

Assessing the Impact of Green Supply Chain Management, Competitive Advantage and Firm Performance in PROPER Companies in Indonesia

“…In addition, there are several control variables added in this study, namely firm age, board size, board meeting and tangibility. These variables were recommended by previous studies because they can affect firm performance (Eluyela et al, 2018;Mallinguh et al, 2020;Mubeen et al, 2020;Pucheta-Martínez & Gallego-Álvarez, 2020;Vu et al, 2019), but the use of these variables is still limited in research on competitive advantage (Jeong & Chung, 2022;Lu et al, 2021;Nkundabanyanga et al, 2018;Nyuur et al, 2019;Whitler & Puto, 2020). This is quantitative research and uses secondary data.…”