2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic mass segmentation using fuzzy contours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We compared the proposed algorithm with the work of K. L. Kashyap et al [8], developed a level set function for segmentation of mammogram images using a Mesh-free based radial basis function (RBF) collocation approach. A comparison is also made with the algorithm of M. Hmida et al [28], where the algorithm was a hybrid between CVM and fuzzy cmeans, they dealt with 57 mammogram images of the class of masses only. N. A. N. Azlan et al [29], used normalization and filtration as a pre-processing before segmenting the image by the active contour method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared the proposed algorithm with the work of K. L. Kashyap et al [8], developed a level set function for segmentation of mammogram images using a Mesh-free based radial basis function (RBF) collocation approach. A comparison is also made with the algorithm of M. Hmida et al [28], where the algorithm was a hybrid between CVM and fuzzy cmeans, they dealt with 57 mammogram images of the class of masses only. N. A. N. Azlan et al [29], used normalization and filtration as a pre-processing before segmenting the image by the active contour method.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Breast segmentation is difficult to spot due to irregularities varying from one person to another. Proper segmentation using AI greatly improves the prognosis of the patient [30]. Breast density assessment is carried out using two-dimensional mammograms [31].…”
Section: Table 1: Different Methods By Which Artificial Intelligence ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M. Hmida, et al suggested a fuzzy-energy-based model that is used for final mass delineation Where was the development of fuzzy contours and calculation of fuzzy membership maps of various groups in the image from the mini-MIAS dataset; incorporation of these maps into the CVM. The experimental findings indicate that with a precision of 88.08 per cent, the process reaches an overall true positive score of 91.12 per cent [18]. S. Soomro et al proposed a system for segmenting the inhomogeneous images by coordinating area force (local and global) term with geodesic edge term in the level set formulation, using the edge scaled method with local and global region-based statistical knowledge to validate the mammogram method images taken from the MIAS miniature dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We compared the proposed algorithm with the work of A. Niaz et al [30], where they included a p-Laplace term with CVM, they tested it on only 25 mammogram images. A comparison is also made with the algorithm of M. Hmida et al [18], where the algorithm was a hybrid between CVM and fuzzy c-means, they dealt with 57 mammogram images of the class of masses only. We also provided a comparison with WACMs to prove the reliability of our work.…”
Section: Comparison With Existing Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%