2017
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djx001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic Density Change With Estrogen and Progestin Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk

Abstract: We found the one-year change in mammographic density after estrogen plus progestin initiation predicted subsequent increase in breast cancer risk. All of the increased risk from estrogen plus progestin use was mediated through mammographic density change. Doctors should evaluate changes in mammographic density with women who initiate estrogen plus progestin therapy and discuss the breast cancer risk implications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
1
8

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
61
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the analysis of the association between MHT exposure and VDG was not significant at a univariate level, this analysis could have been confounded by age. The expected association between exposure to MHT and higher VDG became apparent when MHT exposure was controlled for age (and ethnicity) in the multivariable analysis and is consistent with the association between exposure to MHT and change in mammographic density seen in the Women's Health Initiative study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although the analysis of the association between MHT exposure and VDG was not significant at a univariate level, this analysis could have been confounded by age. The expected association between exposure to MHT and higher VDG became apparent when MHT exposure was controlled for age (and ethnicity) in the multivariable analysis and is consistent with the association between exposure to MHT and change in mammographic density seen in the Women's Health Initiative study …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The radiological feature of the breast seems to reflect the net influence of hormonal and genetic background factors during a woman's life span, which influence the risk of breast cancer [3]. A recent ancillary nested case control study within the WHI trial, demonstrated that a one-year change of 1% in mammographic density after treatment with conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) 0.625 mg plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg predicted a subsequent increase in breast cancer risk by 3% [13]. On the other hand, a long term 18 years follow up of the WHI trial reported no increase in breast cancer mortality by combined CEE/MPA treatment, and CEE only was even associated with a decrease in breast cancer mortality [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both mammographic breast density and cell proliferation have been demonstrated to increase in a significant number of women during MHT [8][9][10][11][12], and also to be more pronounced during combined estrogen/progestogen treatment than for estrogen only [11]. Based on data from the Women's Health Initiative (WHI) study, it was recently shown that an increase in mammographic density by 1% during combined MHT corresponded to a 3% increase in risk of breast cancer [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mammographic density is among the strongest predictors of breast cancer risk and is determined, in part, by estrogen exposure. Estrogen plus progestin hormone therapies increase breast density and can explain the increased risk associated with the use of exogenous hormones (Byrne et al 2017; Chlebowski et al 2013). Conversely, inhibition of signaling through estrogen receptors by Tamoxifen reduced mammographic density and was associated with decreased risk of subsequent breast cancer (Cuzick et al 2011).…”
Section: Modifiers Of Estrogen Signaling --- Challenges and Opportunimentioning
confidence: 99%