2002
DOI: 10.1097/00042192-200203000-00005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mammographic changes associated with raloxifene and tibolone therapy in postmenopausal women: a prospective study

Abstract: Breast density as shown by mammography was stable in a majority of patients and changed in a minority of cases for both tibolone and raloxifene. In most patients, these drugs are not likely to interfere with mammogram interpretation. Larger long-term studies are needed to confirm the impact of prolonged tibolone or raloxifene administration on mammography.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
1
5

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
30
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (29) reported that raloxifene is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at increased risk, yet, unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene has not been found to have an effect on mammographic density. Christodoulakos et al reported no statistically significant change in mammographic density in postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease after 1 year of raloxifene (n = 48) compared with controls (n = 27) using qualitative measures to score mammographic density (21). Similarly, in a nested pilot study, Freedman et al found that the mean mammographic density in a subgroup of postmenopausal women participating in an osteoporosis prevention trial did not significantly change in women receiving raloxifene compared with placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (29) reported that raloxifene is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women at increased risk, yet, unlike tamoxifen, raloxifene has not been found to have an effect on mammographic density. Christodoulakos et al reported no statistically significant change in mammographic density in postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis or cardiovascular disease after 1 year of raloxifene (n = 48) compared with controls (n = 27) using qualitative measures to score mammographic density (21). Similarly, in a nested pilot study, Freedman et al found that the mean mammographic density in a subgroup of postmenopausal women participating in an osteoporosis prevention trial did not significantly change in women receiving raloxifene compared with placebo.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the largest cohort (n = 280), Jackson et al determined that no increase in mammographic density occurred in women on raloxifene as opposed to those on combined hormone replacement therapy, whereas in smaller cohorts mammographic density declined from baseline on raloxifene or showed no significant change. The methodology to assess change in mammographic density in these studies included semiquantitative and, in some cases, purely qualitative means to describe mammographic density (20)(21)(22). Although raloxifene has not been shown to have a large effect on mammographic density in these studies, the effect of raloxifene on mammographic density in premenopausal women is unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 , 13 Similar to breast cancer risk, a higher percentage of women experience increased mammographic breast density when using EPT than those who use only estrogen therapy (ET). 13 Likewise, women using therapies that reduce breast cancer risk, such as tamoxifen 14 , 15 and raloxifene, 16 -18 experience a decrease in mammographic breast density.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48,49 The sample size ranged from 27 to 444 (n = 2005), and 8 of the 9 studies assessed postmenopausal women. Most of the studies administered 60 mg of RLX per day, and the duration of the RLX administration varied from 3 months to 3 years.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%