2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2805301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malware Visualization for Fine-Grained Classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method is similar to the proposed method, in that it uses local features with images of malware. The performance of the method proposed in this study was 2.18% better than that of the method proposed by Jianwen Fu [17]. The method proposed by Sang Ni [21] classifies malware into different families; local images are created using local features extracted from malware.…”
Section: Dataset and Experimental Environmentmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The method is similar to the proposed method, in that it uses local features with images of malware. The performance of the method proposed in this study was 2.18% better than that of the method proposed by Jianwen Fu [17]. The method proposed by Sang Ni [21] classifies malware into different families; local images are created using local features extracted from malware.…”
Section: Dataset and Experimental Environmentmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Jianwen Fu et al generated a global image using the global features of malware along with local features [17]. They used entropy values, byte values and relative sizes of all the sections for each section from the malware-infected PE files to generate the global image; they extracted the texture and color features from this global image using the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) and color moment.…”
Section: Local Feature-based Malware Detection or Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations