Lipids, Lipophilic Components and Essential Oils From Plant Sources 2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-85729-323-7_2415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malus sieversii (Ledeb.) M. Roem. (M. anisophylla Sumn., M. heterophylla Sumn. non valide publ., M. hissarica Kudr., M. jarmolenkoi Sumn., M. juzepczukii Vass. non valide publ., M. kirghisorum Al. Theod. et Fed., M. kudrjaschevii Sumn., M. linczevskii Poljak., M. niedzwetzkyana Dieck, M. persicifolta (M. Pop.) Sumn., M. pumila Mill. var persicifolia M. Pop., M. schischkinii Poljak., M. sieversii subsp. hissarica (Kudr.) Likhonos, M. sieversii subsp. kirghisorum (Al. Theod et Fed.) Likhonos, M. sieversii su

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To identify the biological function of DEGs from bulk transcriptional analysis, the common IMR DEGs were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) (Consortium, 2017) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa et al, 2008) analysis using Metascape (http://metascape.org/gp/index. html), with significant enrichment considered at p < 0.01.…”
Section: Functional Annotation and Pathway Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To identify the biological function of DEGs from bulk transcriptional analysis, the common IMR DEGs were subjected to Gene Ontology (GO) (Consortium, 2017) annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) (Kanehisa et al, 2008) analysis using Metascape (http://metascape.org/gp/index. html), with significant enrichment considered at p < 0.01.…”
Section: Functional Annotation and Pathway Enrichment Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All DEGs were mapped to Gene Ontology (GO) terms in the Gene Ontology database (http:// www.geneontology.org), and the output of enrichment was limited to FDR < 0.05. Pathway enrichment analysis was performed using the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (Kanehisa et al, 2008), and pathways with FDRcorrected p≤ 0.05 were considered significantly enriched in DEGs. The expression modules in Figure 4A were generated by STEM v1.3.7 (Ernst and Bar-Joseph, 2006) based on the FPKM values.…”
Section: Genes Expression Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GO terms with p-value <0.05 were considered as significantly enriched. Pathway enrichment of DEGs was performed using the KEGG database (Kanehisa et al, 2008). Then, the KOBAS software (v2.0.12) was used to test the statistical enrichment of the DEGs in the KEGG pathways (Mao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Transcriptome Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%