Maltreatment and Mental Health Outcomes among Ultra-Poor Children in Burkina Faso: A Latent Class Analysis

Abstract

ObjectivesResearch about the mental health of children in Francophone West Africa is scarce. This paper examines the relationships between adverse childhood experiences, including exposure to violence and exploitation, and mental health outcomes among children living in ultra-poverty in rural Burkina Faso.MethodsThis paper utilizes baseline data collected from 360 children ages 10–15 and 360 of their mothers recruited from twelve impoverished villages in the Nord Region of Burkina, located near the Sahel Desert and affected by extreme food insecurity. We used a Latent Class Analysis to identify underlying patterns of maltreatment. Further, the relationships between latent classes and mental health outcomes were tested using mixed effected regression models adjusted for clustering within villages.ResultsAbout 15% of the children in the study scored above the clinical cut-off for depression, 17.8% for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and 6.4% for low self-esteem. The study identified five distinct sub-groups (or classes) of children based on their exposure to adverse childhood experiences. Children with the highest exposure to violence at home, at work and in the community (Abused and Exploited class) and children not attending school and working for other households, often away from their families (External Laborer class), demonstrated highest symptoms of depression and trauma. Despite living in adverse conditions and working to assist families, the study also identified a class of children who were not exposed to any violence at home or at work (Healthy and Non-abused class). Children in this class demonstrated significantly higher self-esteem (b = 0.92, SE = 0.45, p<0.05) and lower symptoms of trauma (b = -3.90, SE = 1.52, p<0.05).ConclusionsThis study offers insight into the psychological well-being of children in the context of ultra-poverty in Burkina Faso and associated context-specific adverse childhood experiences. Identifying specific sub-groups of children with increased exposure to life stressors has implications for program developers. Study findings indicate a further need to explore the mental health consequences of traumatic experiences within the context of ultra-poverty and to develop integrated economic and psychosocial interventions that prevent or mitigate childhood adversities linked with the family-level poverty and violence in the family.

Incidence of Self-Esteem Among Children Exposed to Sexual Abuse in Kenya

“…Furthermore, some scholars have argued that children who had not been exposed to any abuse demonstrated significantly higher self-esteem and lower symptoms of trauma (Ismayilova et al 2016). This is an indication that exposure to abuse among children could determine their self-esteem.…”

Prevalence and Predictors of Adverse Childhood Experiences among Youths in Rural communities of Oyo State, South-west, Nigeria

“…16 This is a public health problem that requires investigation and attention because the burden and impact of ACEs are more pronounced in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). 17,18 1.53 (95% CI: 1.24-2.87)] (Table 5). Egypt had the highest occurrence of emotional abuse.…”

Agricultural wealth better predicts mental wellbeing than market wealth among highly vulnerable households in Haiti: Evidence for the benefits of a multidimensional approach to poverty

“…Using a statistical reduction technique, household items (eg, TV, bicycle), quality of housing construction (eg, concrete floor), and access to services (eg, electricity) are scaled into a single one-dimensional index. This asset-based indicator has become the key variable used in LMICs to assess economic gradients in education (Filmer & Pritchett, 1999;Lachaud, LeGrand, & Kobiané, 2017), nutrition (Balarajan, Ramakrishnan, Özaltin, Shankar, & Subramanian, 2011;Gwatkin et al, 2007;Mayén, Marques-Vidal, Paccaud, Bovet, & Stringhini, 2014), physical health (Hosseinpoor, Parker, Tursan d'Espaignet, & Chatterji, 2012;Hruschka, Gerkey, & Hadley, 2015;Phaswana-Mafuya, Peltzer, Chirinda, Musekiwa, & Kose, 2013), mortality (Ezeh, Agho, Dibley, Hall, & Page, 2015;Mustafa, 2008), and mental health (Ismayilova, Gaveras, Blum, Tǒ-Camier, & Nanema, 2016). However, this uni-dimensional index really only captures household poverty through livelihoods associated with the cash economy (Filmer & Pritchett, 1999).…”