2012
DOI: 10.1037/a0024812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maltreated children's ability to estimate temporal location and numerosity of placement changes and court visits.

Abstract: Research examining children’s temporal knowledge has tended to utilize brief temporal intervals and singular, neutral events, and is not readily generalizable to legal settings in which maltreated children are asked temporal questions about salient, repeated abuse that often occurred in the distant past. To understand how well maltreated children can describe temporal location and numerosity of documented, personal experiences, we assessed 167 6- to 10-year-old maltreated children’s temporal memory for changes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22 Children provide especially biased responses to discrete (e.g., yes/no) questions 23-26 and have been shown to have difficulty making frequency judgments as required by the Child-SCAT3. 27,28 Consequently, it is considered best practice when interviewing young children to maximize the use of open-ended questions and engage in pre-interview “ground rules” discussions to allow children to practice saying “I don't know” and asking for clarification. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Children provide especially biased responses to discrete (e.g., yes/no) questions 23-26 and have been shown to have difficulty making frequency judgments as required by the Child-SCAT3. 27,28 Consequently, it is considered best practice when interviewing young children to maximize the use of open-ended questions and engage in pre-interview “ground rules” discussions to allow children to practice saying “I don't know” and asking for clarification. 29 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The minimum age of the participants was 14 years: some psychopathology measures used were not standardised for younger children. Moreover, by 14 years of age, adolescents should be able to verbalise temporal relations, given that this ability is already present earlier in development (Friedman, 2007;Orbach & Lamb, 2007;Wandry, Quas, Lyon, & Friedman, 2012), which is relevant to scoring of overgeneral memory. All participants were English speaking and did not have conditions such as mental retardation, schizophrenia, or autism.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While not an open-ended prompt, this format is recommended when asking about frequency because children have difficulty estimating a specific number of occurrences (Sharman, Powell, & Roberts, 2011;Wandrey, Lyon, Quas & Friedman, 2012), and reduces the risk that an inaccurate specific number could hurt credibility. Research showing the difficulty children (and adults) have with NICHD PROTOCOL REVIEW 19 source monitoring has influenced the expectations we should have about the number of separate incidents that interviewers can hope children will describe accurately (for further research on children's ability to describe specific occurrences of repeated events, see Powell, Thomson, & Dietze, 1997;, for reviews).…”
Section: "The Revised Protocol Was Recently Tested In Israel In Two Dmentioning
confidence: 99%