Malpractice Liability and Health Care Quality

Abstract

IMPORTANCEThe tort liability system is intended to serve 3 functions: compensate patients who sustain injury from negligence, provide corrective justice, and deter negligence. Deterrence, in theory, occurs because clinicians know that they may experience adverse consequences if they negligently injure patients. OBJECTIVE To review empirical findings regarding the association between malpractice liability risk (ie, the extent to which clinicians face the threat of being sued and having to pay damages) and health care quality and safety.DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION Systematic search of multiple databases for studies published between January 1, 1990, and November 25, 2019, examining the relationship between malpractice liability risk measures and health outcomes or structural and process indicators of health care quality.DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Information on the exposure and outcome measures, results, and acknowledged limitations was extracted by 2 reviewers. Meta-analytic pooling was not possible due to variations in study designs; therefore, studies were summarized descriptively and assessed qualitatively. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESAssociations between malpractice risk measures and health care quality and safety outcomes. Exposure measures included physicians' malpractice insurance premiums, state tort reforms, frequency of paid claims, average claim payment, physicians' claims history, total malpractice payments, jury awards, the presence of an immunity from malpractice liability, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services' Medicare malpractice geographic practice cost index, and composite measures combining these measures. Outcome measures included patient mortality; hospital readmissions, avoidable admissions, and prolonged length of stay; receipt of cancer screening; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality patient safety indicators and other measures of adverse events; measures of hospital and nursing home quality; and patient satisfaction.RESULTS Thirty-seven studies were included; 28 examined hospital care only and 16 focused on obstetrical care. Among obstetrical care studies, 9 found no significant association between liability risk and outcomes (such as Apgar score and birth injuries) and 7 found limited evidence for an association. Among 20 studies of patient mortality in nonobstetrical care settings, 15 found no evidence of an association with liability risk and 5 found limited evidence. Among 7 studies that examined hospital readmissions and avoidable initial hospitalizations, none found evidence of an association between liability risk and outcomes. Among 12 studies of other measures (eg, patient safety indicators, process-of-care quality measures, patient satisfaction), 7 found no association between liability risk and these outcomes and 5 identified significant associations in some analyses. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEIn this systematic review, most studies found no association between measures of malpractice liability risk and health care quality and outcomes. Although gaps in the ev...

The Frontline Nurse’s Experience of Nursing Outlier Patients

“…Future research directions in softening the concrete and redeveloping the Standard of Care and nurses’ accountability according to the flow of practice changes could be considered [ 54 ]. Furthermore, while a recent systematic review suggested no association between greater risk of malpractice liability and health care quality [ 58 ], the emphasis is on engaging in physicians’ voice rather than the nurses’ voice [ 59 ]. While the delayed nursing care and missed care remain prominent in acute care hospitals internationally [ 60 , 61 ], nursing outlier patients can be a potential stressor worsening the current situation.…”

Effects of State COVID-19 Closure Policy on NON-COVID-19 Health Care Utilization

“…Some states have have taken additional steps to provide protection to physicians who have shifted their practices to telemedicine and those whose treatment decisions may have been based on government directives. Earlier research has pointed to the impacts of medical malpractice pressures on physician treatment decisions (Frakes and Gruber (2019) and Mello et al (2020)). It is therefore plausible that states that added these liability waivers may have higher rates of physician compliance with the directives related to the postponement of elective and nonurgent care.…”

No-Fault Compensation From the Patient Compensation Association in Denmark After Primary Total Hip Replacement in Danish Hospitals 2005-2017

“…The compensation systems in Denmark and New Zealand are in contrast to the American system where both tort and compensation systems are incorporated as one. The American medical liability system is intended to serve three functions: compensate patients injured by negligence, promote corrective justice by providing a mechanism to rectify wrongful losses caused by defendants, and deter negligence (25). This adversarial litigation process can -in our opinion -destroy physicianpatient relationships and involves considerable emotional strain for both plaintiffs and defendants.…”