2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.06.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malpractice in Emergency Medicine—A Review of Risk and Mitigation Practices for the Emergency Medicine Provider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
20
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been described that abdominal pain is amongst the most frequent problems associated with malpractice claims at the emergency department [15]. Other issues are the occurrence of unexpected diagnoses [16] of extra-abdominal origin [17] and problematic "off-hour" presentations with abdominal pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been described that abdominal pain is amongst the most frequent problems associated with malpractice claims at the emergency department [15]. Other issues are the occurrence of unexpected diagnoses [16] of extra-abdominal origin [17] and problematic "off-hour" presentations with abdominal pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, perceived or genuine conflicts of interest may be inevitable in recruiting persons with the expertise required for the GRACE panels. Finally, to reduce practice variability and malpractice risk and improve patient safety, multiple opinion leaders identify the creation of pertinent, updated, and feasible guidelines as an essential resource 23,24 . Despite these recommendations, some argue against organizations like ACEP and SAEM creating clinical practice guidelines, particularly when high‐quality, indisputable evidence is lacking 25,26 .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“… 30 Although AIS is not considered high risk for litigation occurrence compared to other emergency department diagnoses, mitigation steps such as constructive communication and intelligent documentation are paramount. 31 Ultimately, stakeholders in acute stroke care should align such that more multi-faceted views can be represented in national guidelines.…”
Section: Understanding Malpractice Risk and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%