1971
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(71)90147-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malocclusion in the modern Alaskan Eskimo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar lack of sex difference was also reported in Iranian[12] and Danish[13] children. Class I malocclusion was, however, found to be significantly more prevalent in British,[14] Egyptian[11] and Eskimo[15] females, compared to their male counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar lack of sex difference was also reported in Iranian[12] and Danish[13] children. Class I malocclusion was, however, found to be significantly more prevalent in British,[14] Egyptian[11] and Eskimo[15] females, compared to their male counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Class II malocclusion is noted to be more prevalent in white populations of northern European descent,[13] and less prevalent in isolated societies such as Eskimos[15] and American Indians. [16] The occurrence of Class II malocclusion in the present study (25.4%; 21.9% Class II division 1 and 3.5% Class II division 2) was greater than in Gardner's[6] group (18%; 16% Class II division 1 and 2% Class II division 2) and both groups had greater prevalence of Class II cases than Ommar's[5] sample (Class II 2.9%; 2% Class II division 1 and 0.9% Class II division 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies documenting a sudden deterioration of occlusal norms have remarked upon the diet, particularly its physical consistency, and how that changes with Western contact. Such study populations have included Eskimos (Waugh, 1937a(Waugh, , 1937bWilliams, 1943;Price, 1936;Wood, 1971), Australian aborigines (Clinch, 1951), Chinese (Liu, 1977;Goose, 1972), Appalachian Americans (Corruccini and Whitley, 1981), Europeans (Lavelle, 1968;Davies, 19721, Asian Indians (Kaul and Corruccini, 1983;, Melanesians (Lombardi and Bailit, 1972;Corruccini and Pacciani, 19831, Amerinds (Niswander, 1966), and reviews of several populations (Klatsky, 1948;Price, 1935;Hunt, 1961).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inferences from craniofacial growth studies [10] also suggest changes in anteroposterior and vertical relationships during the period from adolescence to early adulthood. Results from studies examining patients of a wide age range [11][12][13][14][15][16][17] may therefore not allow inferences to specifi c age groups. Another problem is inability to accurately adjust for any effect of previous treatment when older age groups are included [18,19] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%