2021
DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2021.1937698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malocclusion and oral health-related quality of life among young Danish adults. Is there a difference between subjects who received orthodontic treatment during adolescence and subjects without treatment need? A cross-sectional study

Abstract: During the last 12 months, how often has the following occurred?0= Never, 1= Hardly ever, 2= occasionally, 3=fairly often, 4= very often 1 Functional limitation 1. Have you had trouble pronouncing any words because of problems with your teeth, mouth or dentures? 2. Have you felt that your sense of taste has worsened because of problems with your teeth, mouth or dentures? 2 Physical pain 3. Have you had painful aching in your mouth? 4. Have you found it uncomfortable to eat any foods because of problems with yo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intr‐aclass correlation coefficient ranged between 0.93 and 1.00 for intra‐ and inter‐rater reproducibility of all measurements, except for three measurements, where the ICC was 0.75 (lower inter‐canine distance), 0.80 (upper arch length) and 0.87 (upper arch length) 25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intr‐aclass correlation coefficient ranged between 0.93 and 1.00 for intra‐ and inter‐rater reproducibility of all measurements, except for three measurements, where the ICC was 0.75 (lower inter‐canine distance), 0.80 (upper arch length) and 0.87 (upper arch length) 25 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…All measurements were performed by the same assessor (S. G.). The error of the method for all the variables used in the present study was previously assessed on a separate sample of 26 randomly selected models by two assessors (A. G. and S. G.), twice, at a 2‐week interval 25 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%