2016
DOI: 10.1111/desc.12481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malleability of implicit associations across development

Abstract: The prevalence of implicit intergroup bias in adults underscores the importance of knowing when during development such biases are most amenable to change. Although research suggests that implicit intergroup bias undergoes little change across development, no studies have directly examined whether developmental differences exist in the capacity for novel implicit associations to form or change. The present study examined this issue among children ages 5-12. Results from over 800 children provided evidence that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given this increased representation of female scientists, children might learn to associate science with both men and women. Exposure to female scientists might also weaken already‐formed associations of science with men (Farland, ; Galdi, Cadinu, & Tomasetto, ; Gonzalez, Dunlop, & Baron, ), especially if students identify with the female role models (Young, Rudman, Buettner, & McLean, ). Consistent with these hypotheses, women's representation among science majors and employed researchers predicted weaker national gender‐science stereotypes across 66 nations in one large study (Miller et al., ).…”
Section: Gender‐science Stereotypes Across Development and Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this increased representation of female scientists, children might learn to associate science with both men and women. Exposure to female scientists might also weaken already‐formed associations of science with men (Farland, ; Galdi, Cadinu, & Tomasetto, ; Gonzalez, Dunlop, & Baron, ), especially if students identify with the female role models (Young, Rudman, Buettner, & McLean, ). Consistent with these hypotheses, women's representation among science majors and employed researchers predicted weaker national gender‐science stereotypes across 66 nations in one large study (Miller et al., ).…”
Section: Gender‐science Stereotypes Across Development and Historicalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interesting future questions concern how to leverage the insight gained by studies of bias reduction among adults to create manipulations that are effective with children. Indeed, current research suggests that implicit associations are malleable based on new information [9798], and that similar interventions could be effective for adults and children [9293]. Indeed, efforts to change the structure of social categorization among children may be even more impactful, since children have less experience, meaning their stereotypes and bias may be less entrenched and easier to overcome.…”
Section: Using Malleability Of Social Categorization To Reduce Socialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dual-process framework might thus combine the constructs of conscious cognitive interference (Barlow, 1986), conscious and unconscious information-processing (Janssen et al, 2000), and cognitive processing capacity (de Jong, 2009;van Lankveld, 2010) that were previously proposed as separate determinants of sexual responding and sexual dysfunction. Implicit attitudes have been suggested to develop through different pathways, reflecting both deeply ingrained cultural stereotypes (Nosek et al, 2009;Steffens & Buchner, 2003) and the result of learning experiences in individual personal history (Gonzalez, Dunlop, & Baron, 2017), as a result of frequent pairings of stimuli with the same emotional state (Gawronski & Bodenhausen, 2006). Adding implicit cognitive mechanisms to psychological models featuring explicit and conscious cognition, has been shown to increase their explanatory power in other fields, including affective disorders, alcohol-related disorder, and eating disorder (see Roefs et al, 2011, for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%