2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.2011.01994.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mallards Feed Longer to Maintain Intake Rate under Competition on a Natural Food Distribution

Abstract: 24Animals foraging in groups may benefit from a faster detection of food and predators, but competition 25 by conspecifics may reduce intake rate. Competition may also alter the foraging behaviour of

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing the amount of time being vigilant will also increase the animals’ energetic expenditure and therefore decrease their fitness [ 53 55 ]. Hence, feeding time and/or peck rate should increase to compensate for the cost of these behavioural activities [ 26 , 30 , 52 , 56 ]. Indeed, we recorded the compensation behaviour for both subordinate and dominant species by increasing their peck rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing the amount of time being vigilant will also increase the animals’ energetic expenditure and therefore decrease their fitness [ 53 55 ]. Hence, feeding time and/or peck rate should increase to compensate for the cost of these behavioural activities [ 26 , 30 , 52 , 56 ]. Indeed, we recorded the compensation behaviour for both subordinate and dominant species by increasing their peck rate.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Wiens [ 28 ] the necessary conditions of interspecific competition are: (1) species must rely on the same resource and (2) joint exploitation of those resources and/or interference interactions concerning resources negatively affect either one or both species. Interference competition usually incorporates a social component, some individuals being denied access to resources by the (often aggressive) actions of others [ 30 ]. Through social interactions and aggressive encounters between competitors, the larger species may control the best patches whereas smaller species are forced to sub-optimal habitat where they experience a reduction in intake rate [ 33 , 34 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During these periods, we assumed that the mallards were continuously foraging. Although some information is available on seed intake rates under lab conditions (Klaassen, Nolet & De Fouw 2006;van Dijk et al 2012), it is difficult to estimate the number of seeds actually consumed by mallards in the field (and thus how many seeds are potentially dispersed). We therefore designed the model to estimate the spatial probability distribution of seed deposition rather than the absolute numbers, and assumed a constant intake rate of 1000 seeds h À1 during foraging periods to facilitate interpretation of the results.…”
Section: T H E M O D E L : S E E D P a R T ( I N G E S T I O N A N D mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seed intake rates by mallards have been quantified under artificial, controlled conditions (e.g. van Dijk et al 2012) and shown to be seed size-dependent (Fritz, Durant & Guillemain 2001). However, for realistic quantification of seed intake in the field, this should be studied using natural seed densities provided to the animals in a way they also encounter seeds in the field.…”
Section: F U T U R E D I R E C T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, when it comes to seaducks, all such teams were from North America or involved North American researchers (e.g., common eider [ Somateria mollissima ] in Guillemette et al , Varennes et al ; common eider, lesser scaup [ Aythya affinis ], and white‐winged scoter [ Melanitta fusca ] in Richman and Lovvorn , ; Supporting Information Appendix S2). Conversely, all of the studies on intake rate assessments for freshwater diving and dabbling ducks were conducted by European teams (common pochard [ Aythya ferina ] in Gyimesi et al ; mallard in Fritz et al , van Dijk et al ; Eurasian teal in Arzel et al , Eurasian wigeon [ Anas penelope ] in Durant et al ). Similarly, European research teams (e.g., Finnish, Dutch, or French) have studied patch choice and patch decision rules in dabbling ducks (e.g., Pöysä , van Eerden and Munsterman , Guillemain et al , Klaassen et al ); a European consortium analyzed such constraints on individual duck foraging behavior in a full‐annual, flyway‐scale approach (Arzel et al , ).…”
Section: The Behavioral “Optimal Foraging” Approach Of European Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%