2004
DOI: 10.3171/jns.2004.101.2.0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant progression in meningioma: documentation of a series and analysis of cytogenetic findings

Abstract: The authors documented the progression of meningiomas from benign to a higher histological grade. These tumors were associated with a complex karyotype that was present ab initio in a histologically lower-grade tumor, contradicting the stepwise clonal evolution model. Although it was limited to the tested probes, the FISH method appears to be more accurate than the standard cytogenetic one in detecting these alterations. Tumors that present with complex genetic alterations, even those with a benign histologica… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
137
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
6
137
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on that, a model of genetic progression was proposed for meningiomas, similar to other malignancies [25]. Subsequent data, however, suggested that genetic alterations present in recurrent, grade II-III meningiomas were already present in the initial tumor, failing to confirm the "progression" model [28,29]. Our observations support correlations between LOH data and histological analysis, are unable to support the "progression" model, and do not increase the prognostic power of LOH.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…Based on that, a model of genetic progression was proposed for meningiomas, similar to other malignancies [25]. Subsequent data, however, suggested that genetic alterations present in recurrent, grade II-III meningiomas were already present in the initial tumor, failing to confirm the "progression" model [28,29]. Our observations support correlations between LOH data and histological analysis, are unable to support the "progression" model, and do not increase the prognostic power of LOH.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…This risk should be considered when decisions are made to use radiation in routine imaging examinations, such as CT scanning, 10 or to administer higher doses of radiation for treatment of benign tumors during childhood, adolescence, and young adulthood. [2][3][4]17,42,78,81 Radiation-induced meningiomas are characterized by marked changes to the scalp, including alopecia, atrophy, and poor vascularization. Patients with RIMs frequently present with multiple tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,76 Histological features are distinctive compared with SM. Soffer et al 76 have noted high cellularity, nuclear pleomorphism, an increased mitotic rate, focal necrosis, bone invasion, and tumor infiltration of the brain in a series of 42 patients with low-dose RIM.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Meningiomamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38 Additional possible explanations for the difficulty in predicting the behavior of meningiomas have included the observations that there are numerous histological similarities between tumors in each grade and that these tumors exist along a spectrum in which lowgrade meningiomas can progress to a higher grade. 2 There is no clear explanation, however, as to why the majority of recurrent meningiomas derive from benign histology even after apparently radical removal. 55 Other attempts to classify meningiomas have used genomic techniques to study their genesis and progres sion, 73 as well as to search for genetic mutations and variable gene expression mediated via epigenetic modi fications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%