1989
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1054022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant glial tumours: prognostic value of quantitative microscopy

Abstract: Nuclear and cell density features have been measured in 22 cases of glioblastoma divided into two groups according to their survival periods, i.e. less than 12 months or more than 12. The results have demonstrated that the logarithmic transformation of the following features show up statistically significant differences (p less than 0.05): mean of the logarithm of nuclear area, standard deviation of the logarithm of perimeter and standard deviation of the logarithm of the roundness factor. The standard deviati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A distinct overlap of morphometric data between different tumour types and tumour grades was found when investigating heterogeneous sets of gliomas [3,7,8,28,36,37]. Of note, glioblastomas show a large variation of morphometric data explaining the overlap with data from other brain tumours [8,21,33,38,39]. Better discrimination has been achieved in those studies that have performed pairwise morphometric comparisons between different tumour grades.…”
Section: Morphometry Of Tumour Cell Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A distinct overlap of morphometric data between different tumour types and tumour grades was found when investigating heterogeneous sets of gliomas [3,7,8,28,36,37]. Of note, glioblastomas show a large variation of morphometric data explaining the overlap with data from other brain tumours [8,21,33,38,39]. Better discrimination has been achieved in those studies that have performed pairwise morphometric comparisons between different tumour grades.…”
Section: Morphometry Of Tumour Cell Nucleimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19,46,47] Nuclear texture • Calculation of parameters from the grey values of the digitized nuclear image: -Parameters describing grey value distribution: mean, standard deviation, curtosis ( Figure 2), -Parameters describing the so-called 'co-occurrence matrix' and 'run-length matrix' of the grey values (entropy, contrast, etc.). [21,25,28,29,33,37,38,39] Nucleoli • Determination of parameters in toluidine blue stained smears or in silver-impregnated histologic slides for investigation of nucleolar organizer regions (' AgNORs'). [59,60,62] Important parameters: numerical density, size (area), distance from nuclear membrane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these grading systems do not include clinical variables such as patient's age and site of tumor [14], which have been implicated in determining the prognosis to a significant extent [9,10,15]. To objectivise the grading systems, semi-automated and automated computerized image analysis techniques for morphometric evaluation of various histopathological features have been applied in brain tumors by some workers [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24]. Recently, a semi-objectivised computer-aided malignancy classifier software named TESTAST 268 has been proposed for astrocytomas grade i to 4 and mixed gliomas [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%