“…Since some of the criteria, particularly the third point, although important in theory, are not quite feasible in clinical practice, Khafif et al (4) modified the criteria to emphasize the significance of clinical and histopathological evidence. These criteria are widely acknowledged by the majority of scholars, including Martin et al Furthermore, they all agree that histopathological evidence is the most crucial criterion, i.e., histopathological proof of gradual transition of normal squamous epithelium into invasive carcinoma (1,11,12). Clinically, it is also important that there is an absence of any identifiable primary malignant tumors following a thorough evaluation of the patient with endoscopy (nasopharyngoscopy, laryngoscopy, bronchoscopy and esophagoscopy) and radiographic examinations.…”