1987
DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100101550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malignant external otitis versus acute external otitis

Abstract: Malignant External Otitis (MEO) and Acute External Otitis (AEO) are clinically very similar in their beginnings. It is important to differentiate between them very early. Bone scanning is the best diagnostic tool. Eight cases of AEO and MEO are herewith presented.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By now it must have become clear to the reader that there is a fair amount of nosological uncertainty, and as a result some confusion in terminology: the interpretative difficulties particularly concern less severe forms of MEO, without complications and with untypical features, where a clear-cut distinction from non-malignant external otitis is not always easy to make. Furthermore, this consideration reflects the uncertainty surrounding the pathogenesis of MEO: whether it should be thought of as a distinct entity ah initio from non-malignant external otitis, or whether the two forms represent different evolutions of a single initial disease (14). Differential diagnosis between the malignant and non-malignant variety, however, would be very useful at an early stage, as this permits selection of the most appropriate type and length of treatment, and thus determines not only the Malianant external otitis costs to the patient and health service (11,14), but above all the prognosis, which in M E 0 is related to timely therapeutic intervention ( 15).…”
Section: Review O F the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…By now it must have become clear to the reader that there is a fair amount of nosological uncertainty, and as a result some confusion in terminology: the interpretative difficulties particularly concern less severe forms of MEO, without complications and with untypical features, where a clear-cut distinction from non-malignant external otitis is not always easy to make. Furthermore, this consideration reflects the uncertainty surrounding the pathogenesis of MEO: whether it should be thought of as a distinct entity ah initio from non-malignant external otitis, or whether the two forms represent different evolutions of a single initial disease (14). Differential diagnosis between the malignant and non-malignant variety, however, would be very useful at an early stage, as this permits selection of the most appropriate type and length of treatment, and thus determines not only the Malianant external otitis costs to the patient and health service (11,14), but above all the prognosis, which in M E 0 is related to timely therapeutic intervention ( 15).…”
Section: Review O F the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shamboul and Burns Cohen et al 1959Cohen et al 1968Cohen et al 1971Cohen et al 1972Cohen et al 1972Cohen et al 1975Cohen et al 1976Cohen et al 1976Cohen et al 1976Cohen et al 1977Cohen et al 1977Cohen et al 1978Cohen et al 1978Cohen et al 1978Cohen et al 1980Cohen et al 1981Cohen et al 1981Cohen et al 1982Cohen et al 1982Cohen et al 1982Cohen et al 1982Cohen et al 1982Cohen et al 1983Cohen et al 1983Cohen et al 1985 No. of Cases Reported treated surgically it was always found.…”
Section: Ichimuramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Necrotizing external otitis is currently thought to represent a spectrum of disease, with invasion of soft tissues early in the process and bone involvement as the disease progresses 3‐5 . The ability to recognize this disease in its very early stages has led to difficulty in differentiating early NEO from severe acute otitis externa in some cases 4‐6 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classically, NEO has been considered a disease of elderly diabetic patients 1‐5 . However, several reports of NEO in patients without diabetes have been documented 2,7‐13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%