Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Computing and Artificial Intelligence 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3194452.3194459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malicious Code Detection based on Image Processing Using Deep Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A deep learning method using convolutional neural network was employed by Kumar et al at [42] to identify unknown malware programs. The authors visualized malicious codes in the form of gray-scale images to address the challenge of malware identification and classification.…”
Section: B Malware Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A deep learning method using convolutional neural network was employed by Kumar et al at [42] to identify unknown malware programs. The authors visualized malicious codes in the form of gray-scale images to address the challenge of malware identification and classification.…”
Section: B Malware Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Khan et al [49,50] analysed ResNet and GoogleNet models for malware detection using image processing technique. Kumar et al [51,52] used the Convolutional Neural Network CNN model for malicious code detection based on pattern recognition and permission-induced risk for Android IoT Devices, respectively. Comparison of the different approaches for botnet identification is a difficult task because different evaluations and experiments use different botnet samples and data sets.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Machine Learning Classifiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It randomly separated 10% samples for testing from malware family. Reference [34] designed a deep learning model for malware detection. The proposed approach achieved 98% classification accuracy for 9339 malware samples.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%