2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2005.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male Victims of partner violence: Prevalence and accuracy of screening tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven studies (Douglas and Hines, 2011;Drijber et al, 2013;Hines and Douglas, 2010;Mele and Roberts, 2011;Mills et al, 2006;Nayback-Beebe and Yoder, 2012;Reid et al, 2008) included male participants only, investigating experiences of men reporting domestic abuse, characteristics, and health effects. Hogan et al (2012) (2009) sampled court records exploring male requests for legal protection from domestic abuse and subsequent judicial responses.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Seven studies (Douglas and Hines, 2011;Drijber et al, 2013;Hines and Douglas, 2010;Mele and Roberts, 2011;Mills et al, 2006;Nayback-Beebe and Yoder, 2012;Reid et al, 2008) included male participants only, investigating experiences of men reporting domestic abuse, characteristics, and health effects. Hogan et al (2012) (2009) sampled court records exploring male requests for legal protection from domestic abuse and subsequent judicial responses.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Men reported sustaining physical injuries (Hines and Douglas, 2010;Mills et al, 2006), although did not report compromised physical health (Reid et al, 2008;Coker et al, 2008).…”
Section: Harms and Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25] Health-care research on IPV and men, though, is quite limited. There are few studies that explore its prevalence in the health-care setting, [26][27][28][29][30] the accuracy and efficacy of medical screening, 29,31,32 the ability of interview procedures to distinguish victimization from perpetration, 32,33 and the efficacy of a health-care responses to men, including of batterer's treatment programs. 34,35 Although published expert experience exists, 33,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] there are no comprehensive healthcare guidelines on addressing IPV specifically with men.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rates of victimization in this primary care sample were similar to those reported previously by men in emergency departments. 21,22 Given research that indicates that victimization histories in men are linked to poor health outcomes, these findings indicate another area of opportunity for intervention. 23 Given the small numbers of participants in subgroup analyses, results other than those reported above-which are the only ones that specifically focus on and can inform the primary goals of this study, assessing the feasibility and efficiency of primary care provider screening-cannot be used to claim with certainty that clinical site, provider sex, and provider training differences seen across subgroups might be indicative of where, how, and by whom any subsequent studies of primary care screening should be completed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%