2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-19741-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male sex identified by global COVID-19 meta-analysis as a risk factor for death and ITU admission

Abstract: Anecdotal evidence suggests that Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, exhibits differences in morbidity and mortality between sexes. Here, we present a meta-analysis of 3,111,714 reported global cases to demonstrate that, whilst there is no difference in the proportion of males and females with confirmed COVID-19, male patients have almost three times the odds of requiring intensive treatment unit (ITU) admission (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 2.06, 3.92) and higher odds of death (O… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

155
934
33
33

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,200 publications
(1,161 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
155
934
33
33
Order By: Relevance
“…[13] Interestingly, CDC (Dec 2020) finds similar range of mortality comparison between patients below and above 65 years in US population. [14] Further, male gender has hazard ratios (1.27, CI 0.7 -2.23) signifying higher risk of mortality in male population, which is congruent to other international studies [15] where odds of death has been (1.39; 95% CI 1.31 -1.47) comparable. Respiratory Symptoms like distress, higher rate of respiration (>24/min) or silent hypoxemia detected through lower oxygen level (<90%) have shown higher risk of mortality (see Table 2) and find their due weightage in the Gradient Boosting algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…[13] Interestingly, CDC (Dec 2020) finds similar range of mortality comparison between patients below and above 65 years in US population. [14] Further, male gender has hazard ratios (1.27, CI 0.7 -2.23) signifying higher risk of mortality in male population, which is congruent to other international studies [15] where odds of death has been (1.39; 95% CI 1.31 -1.47) comparable. Respiratory Symptoms like distress, higher rate of respiration (>24/min) or silent hypoxemia detected through lower oxygen level (<90%) have shown higher risk of mortality (see Table 2) and find their due weightage in the Gradient Boosting algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Nonetheless, an inverse tendency was noticed in the elderly group during the reopening and second wave compared to pre-COVID and lockdown. Male and old people have been proven to face severe respiratory diseases more frequently due to Sars-Cov-2 infection, as revealed by the higher number of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and mortality rate [ 29 , 30 ]. The raising awareness and acknowledge about COVID-19 clinical features, regardless of the actual spread of coronavirus infection, might have induced old male people to follow social distancing rules more, thus also avoiding visiting the UDCS if not strictly necessary during the reopening and second wave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 In contrast, SLE is a female-predominant disease which may represent a protective factor, as COVID-19 has been shown to affect males more severely. 3 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 One interesting feature is that inflammation in SLE is often characterized by elevation of type I interferon (IFN), which has antiviral properties and could potentially be protective. This is not known, however, and even if true, it could be offset by other sociodemographic, biologic, and clinical aspects of the disease and its management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%