1988
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(88)80126-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male mating success in red-sided garter snakes: Size is not important

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
24
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
3
24
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In European adders, the intensity of selection on male body size varies from year to year, correlated with (and, presumably, depending upon) the degree to which success in male-male combat determines a male's mating opportunities (Madsen and Shine 1993a). Similarly, studies on snake species that do not display male-male combat have reported only minor (or no) effects of increased male body size on mating success (Shine 1986;Joy and Crews 1988; but see Weatherhead et al 1995;Luiselli 1996;Shine et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In European adders, the intensity of selection on male body size varies from year to year, correlated with (and, presumably, depending upon) the degree to which success in male-male combat determines a male's mating opportunities (Madsen and Shine 1993a). Similarly, studies on snake species that do not display male-male combat have reported only minor (or no) effects of increased male body size on mating success (Shine 1986;Joy and Crews 1988; but see Weatherhead et al 1995;Luiselli 1996;Shine et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large-male mating advantage has been shown in many animal systems, though the mechanism underlying this advantage varies with the species (Howard 1978;Partridge et al 1987;Mathis 1991;Cooper and Vitt 1993; but see Joy and Crews 1988;Sullivan 1989 for opposing findings). In our field population of A. aperta the mean weight of males in successful mating attempts was approximately 32% greater than the mean weight of males involved in unsuccessful mating attempts.…”
Section: Mating Success and Sexual Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In red-sided garter snakes, Joy and Crews (1988) found no advantage to greater size or weight among males within aggregations, while Madsen and Shine (1993a) found that larger male grass snakes were more successful in mating aggregations in captivity. Neither study documented the success of individual males over a breeding season.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, in northern water snakes, for example, swimming speed increases with male size (Weatherhead and Robertson 1992), so mobility per se does not explain why males are small. Joy and Crews (1988) found that variation in either length or weight did not affect male success within mating aggregations of red-sided garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalisparietalis), but did not speculate as to why males are smaller than females. Semlitsch and Gibbons (1982) proposed that lower maintenance costs might favor smaller males in two species of Nerodia, and Shine (1986) proposed that allocation of energy to mate searching rather than growth might favor smaller males in filesnakes (Acrochordus araurae).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%