Male infertility, what Mobile Health Applications “know”: quality analysis and adherence to European Association of Urology Guidelines

Abstract

Introduction: Male infertility (MI) is one of the most important worrying topics for the fertile age population. Nowadays, several mobile health applications (MHAs) have been developed to help and assist patients suffering from male infertility (MI), but their quality and adherence to the guidelines is not solved issue yet. Materials and methods: On 2nd July 2022, an observational cross-sectional descriptive study of all MHAs on male infertility was conducted: a search on both the iTunes App Store and Google Play Store was performed. Our group reviewed all MHAs, evaluating the quality, using Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS), and the adherence to European Association of Urology guidelines, with a special tool created for this manuscript. Results: In the final analysis we included 10 MHAs: 20% (n = 2) from the iTunes App Store and 80% (n = 8) from the Google Play Store. Across the sample, 80% (n = 8) of the apps provided general information on MI, 60% (n = 6) focused on diagnosis and 50% (n = 5) focused on treatment options, respectively. According to MARS tool, the mean score was 2.18 (0.78), 3.78 (0.36), 3.0 (0.53), 3.19 (0.45), 2.18 (0.54) for Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetic, Information and Subjective quality, respectively. According to EAU Adherence Score, the highest score was reported by “Infertilità” with 12/15 points while the lowest score was reported by “Fertility Diet Guide”, 0/15 points. Conclusions: Nowadays, MHAs present in the market are not a reliable source of information on MI. An ideal MHAs should be based on scientific evidence, user friendly, respecting privacy and security laws, making patients feel capable and confident to change personal behavior or attitudes.

A mobile health application for prostate cancer antigen dosage: is it time to say goodbye to classic screening methods?

“…Indeed, while MHAs on PSA are aesthetically satisfying (mean score of 3.11), the engagement, the functionality, the information, the MARS total mean score and the subjective quality were all under the threshold of acceptability, respectively. These findings are consistent with previous reports on urological and non-urological fields (Fusco et al ., 2022; Cirillo et al ., 2023). For instance, Napolitano et al .…”

“…Indeed, according to Jupp et al ., the ‘Functionality’ of MHAs stands as one of the main technical skills sought by patients(Jupp et al , 2018). As it stands, healthcare and medical institutions are still missing the potential of reaching patients through this technology (Mirone et al , 2021a, b; Fusco et al ., 2022). Moreover, we identified a strong positively correlations between information, app subjective quality and other MARS items.…”

Mobile health applications in kidney stone disease management: A reliable support for patients?

“…Mobile application represented a valid instrument both for patients and for physicians to manage chronic diseases, as previously assessed (9,(11)(12)(13). Furthermore, the clinical utility of MHAs is required to be assessed as the adherence to EAU guidelines for the condition considered.…”

“…The possible score on the checklist ranged from 0 to 15 for each app. To facilitate evaluation, adherence to the checklist was arbitrarily considered low with a total score ranging from 0 to 5, medium (6-10), and high (11)(12)(13)(14)(15).…”

Sexual dysfunction: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?

“…To the Editor, Sexual dysfunction (SD) includes erectile dysfunction (ED) defined as the persistent inability to attain and/or maintain penile erection sufficient to permit satisfactory sexual performance, ejaculation disorders, orgasmic dysfunctions, and disorders of sexual interest/desire (1). Sexual health is an important aspect of our patients' lives, with a high impact on patients and partners quality of life and SD represents one of the most important problems worldwide, affecting a growing number of men and women (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Several risk factors have been identified in male sexual dysfunction (MSD) such as atherosclerosis, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, smoking, obesity, sedentary lifestyle, chronic alcohol use, benign prostate hyperplasia (9).…”