Male infanticide leads to social monogamy in primates

Abstract

Although common in birds, social monogamy, or pair-living, is rare among mammals because internal gestation and lactation in mammals makes it advantageous for males to seek additional mating opportunities. A number of hypotheses have been proposed to explain the evolution of social monogamy among mammals: as a male mate-guarding strategy, because of the benefits of biparental care, or as a defense against infanticidal males. However, comparative analyses have been unable to resolve the root causes of monogamy. Primates are unusual among mammals because monogamy has evolved independently in all of the major clades. Here we combine trait data across 230 primate species with a Bayesian likelihood framework to test for correlated evolution between monogamy and a range of traits to evaluate the competing hypotheses. We find evidence of correlated evolution between social monogamy and both female ranging patterns and biparental care, but the most compelling explanation for the appearance of monogamy is male infanticide. It is only the presence of infanticide that reliably increases the probability of a shift to social monogamy, whereas monogamy allows the secondary adoption of paternal care and is associated with a shift to discrete ranges. The origin of social monogamy in primates is best explained by long lactation periods caused by altriciality, making primate infants particularly vulnerable to infanticidal males. We show that biparental care shortens relative lactation length, thereby reducing infanticide risk and increasing reproductive rates. These phylogenetic analyses support a key role for infanticide in the social evolution of primates, and potentially, humans.

Correlates of genetic monogamy in socially monogamous mammals: insights from Azara's owl monkeys

“…These studies on the evolution of social monogamy analysed the correlated evolution of social monogamy with the traits 'male care', 'grouping structure of females' and 'infanticide risk' within primates [44] and mammals [22]. Opie et al [44] concluded that male infanticide is the most compelling explanation for the appearance of monogamy, a conclusion that may warrant further examination given that their results show similar support for a relationship to biparental care and female ranges [90]. By contrast, Lukas & Clutton-Brock [22] suggest that social monogamy evolved where males were unable to defend multiple females and conclude that its evolution was not associated with a high risk of male infanticide.…”

Human Homosexuality: A Paradigmatic Arena for Sexually Antagonistic Selection?

“…A lesbian strategy to exclude the intrusion in the household of a new potentially infanticidal male might have produced strong fitness benefits on the female side. Recent studies show that female counterstrategies to avoid male infanticide in humans have been powerful in determining the adaptive value of a trait (de Waal and Gavrilets 2013;Lukas and Clutton Brock 2013;Opie et al 2013). All of the above causes might have significantly contributed to balance past HS females' lack of erotic attraction to males, increasing their fecundity compared with the present day, to possibly match the average heterosexual fecundity.…”

Initial Condition and Behavior Patterns in Learning Dynamics: Study of Complexity and Sustainability from Time Series

“…The considerable cognitive requirements of life in complex societies have resulted in many primate species having larger and more expensive brains [70], with all that this implies in connectivity. The human immersed in evolution has historically transferred the cost of learning the complexity of nature, and there is ample evidence.…”