1999
DOI: 10.1007/s000400050107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male dimorphism in Perdita portalis (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) has arisen from preexisting allometric patterns

Abstract: Allometric scaling coefficients were quantified using principal components analysis for eight species of closely related Perdita bees. The coefficients were mapped onto a cladogram and male dimorphism in P. portalis was found to be the derived state, whereas polymorphism was ancestral. The phylogeny explained 87.4 ± 1.1% of the variation in male head allometry among taxa, indicating that the evolution of head allometry is highly congruent with the cladogram. These results were used to place Perdita male head a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measures of head width and interocular distance are linearly and isometrically related to body size (wet and dry weight) in a number of other bee species in which, like O. rufa, males do not exhibit extreme size variation linked to alternative mating strategies (Danforth and Desjardins, 1999;Marlovits, 1994;Rust, 1991).…”
Section: Size Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measures of head width and interocular distance are linearly and isometrically related to body size (wet and dry weight) in a number of other bee species in which, like O. rufa, males do not exhibit extreme size variation linked to alternative mating strategies (Danforth and Desjardins, 1999;Marlovits, 1994;Rust, 1991).…”
Section: Size Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would open up study of the evolutionary origins of intraspecific diversity in male mating behaviour or morphology (Danforth and Desjardins, 1999). An important and still open question is the extent to which interindividual variation in male behaviour is genetically determined or is conditional upon environment (e.g.…”
Section: Intraspecific Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measure of cephalic polymorphism was the genal index (per Sakagami and Moure, 1965), calculated as the division of the genal width by eye width. Due to the striking variation in head size, we also used a number of other measurements to assess overall body size including: intertegular distance, which reliably correlates which with body weight in a variety of bees (Cane, 1987); hind tibia length (per Danforth and Desjardins, 1999); and the wing length of one randomly chosen forewing, measured as the distance from the axillary sclerites to the base of the stigma. The number of nicks and tears along the distal margin of this wing was taken as a measure of wing wear.…”
Section: Dissections and Morphometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%