2018
DOI: 10.1111/bju.14102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition: a meta‐analysis

Abstract: We aimed to assess male circumcision for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) acquisition in heterosexual and homosexual men using all available data. A systematic literature review was conducted searching for studies that assessed male circumcision as a method to prevent HIV acquisition in homosexual and/or heterosexual men. PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched in March 2017. A random effects model was used to calculate a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
(26 reference statements)
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous observational studies and trials have confirmed the protective effect of male circumcision, which can reduce the risk that heterosexual men will contract HIV by 60% to 70%. 6,7,[39][40][41] The last cluster included Southern and East African countries. These countries had high HIV prevalence and incidence, except for Rwanda and Burundi, and their rate of male circumcision was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous observational studies and trials have confirmed the protective effect of male circumcision, which can reduce the risk that heterosexual men will contract HIV by 60% to 70%. 6,7,[39][40][41] The last cluster included Southern and East African countries. These countries had high HIV prevalence and incidence, except for Rwanda and Burundi, and their rate of male circumcision was low.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when subgroups were analyzed, the results of 7 studies of men reporting an insertive role were statistically significant for a 27% reduction in HIV acquisition in contrast to the 3 studies of men reporting a receptive role [53]. However, a more recent metaanalysis by Sharma et al that examined the impact of sexual roles among homosexual men reported that MC did not definitively have a protective effect among predominantly insertive homosexual men or receptive men but acknowledged that there were a small number of studies reporting the effect of sexual role on HIV acquisition [54].…”
Section: Homosexual Transmissionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent meta‐analyses have shown HIV protective effects of MC in circumcised men of 70% (95% CI 0.24‐0.38; P < .00001) and 72% (95% CI 1.7‐7.1) …”
Section: Physical Harmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(95% CI 1.7-7.1). 226 Compelling biological reasons explain the vulnerability of the foreskin to HIV infection. 80,[227][228][229][230][231] Infectivity is exacerbated in inflammatory states and ulceration from sexually transmitted infections (STIs), [232][233][234][235][236] coital injuries (more common in uncircumcised men), [127][128][129] and foreskin size.…”
Section: In Heterosexual Menmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation