2014
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-092412-090539
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male Circumcision: A Globally Relevant but Under-Utilized Method for the Prevention of HIV and Other Sexually Transmitted Infections

Abstract: Randomized trials have demonstrated that male circumcision (MC) reduces heterosexual acquisition of HIV, herpes simplex virus type-2, human papillomavirus (HPV), and genital ulcer disease (GUD) among men, and reduces HPV, GUD, bacterial vaginosis and trichomoniasis among female partners. The pathophysiology behind these effects is multifactorial, relying on anatomic and cellular changes. MC is cost-effective and potentially cost saving in both the US and Africa. The WHO and Joint United Nations Program on HIV/… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…32 A meta-analysis of studies reporting on the association of male circumcision and syphilis, essentially among HIV-1 uninfected men, reported a summary relative risk of 0·69, (95% CI 0·50–0·94) similar to our findings. 9 Two prior randomized trials have assessed the effect of male circumcision (versus delayed male circumcision) on syphilis acquisition among HIV-1 uninfected men; neither found a protective effect: adjusted HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·75–1·65 and risk ratio 1·23, 95% CI 0·41–3·65.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…32 A meta-analysis of studies reporting on the association of male circumcision and syphilis, essentially among HIV-1 uninfected men, reported a summary relative risk of 0·69, (95% CI 0·50–0·94) similar to our findings. 9 Two prior randomized trials have assessed the effect of male circumcision (versus delayed male circumcision) on syphilis acquisition among HIV-1 uninfected men; neither found a protective effect: adjusted HR 1·10, 95% CI 0·75–1·65 and risk ratio 1·23, 95% CI 0·41–3·65.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Global health leaders have called for further research that will help explain the low uptake of VMMC compared to coverage targets [4]. The present study responds to this call.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…36 We obtained the adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) using a model that controlled for demographics and previously-identified correlates of BV (age, education, parity, partner circumcision status, sexual frequency, vaginal hygiene practices, condom use, and HSV-2 serostatus). 10, 37-38 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%