2007
DOI: 10.1080/00224490701443973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male Bisexuality and Condom Use at Last Sexual Encounter: Results From a National Survey

Abstract: Relatively little is known about condom use among bisexual men as separate and distinct from exclusively homosexual and heterosexual men. Most previous research on bisexual men has relied on non-probabilistic, high risk samples with limited generalizability. We examined the relationship between male behavioral bisexuality and condom use in the 2002 cycle of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG). Bisexually-active men positively differed from heterosexually- and homosexually-active men on every indicator … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of HI Latino MSMW found in our sample increases the generalizability of our results. Although HI Latino MSMW represented only 6% of the final sample, this percentage was greater than estimates of behavioral bisexuality in studies in Mexico and U.S. national samples (Izazola-Licea et al, 2003;Jeffries & Dodge, 2007;Mosher, Chandra, & Jones, 2005;Smith, 1991). The figure was slightly lower than that estimated by previous studies with Latino men in the United States (Montgomery et al, 2003;Wolitski et al, 2006), but this may have resulted from our use of anal sex as a defining criterion for sexual orientation, as opposed to including both anal and oral sex as sufficient conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…The percentage of HI Latino MSMW found in our sample increases the generalizability of our results. Although HI Latino MSMW represented only 6% of the final sample, this percentage was greater than estimates of behavioral bisexuality in studies in Mexico and U.S. national samples (Izazola-Licea et al, 2003;Jeffries & Dodge, 2007;Mosher, Chandra, & Jones, 2005;Smith, 1991). The figure was slightly lower than that estimated by previous studies with Latino men in the United States (Montgomery et al, 2003;Wolitski et al, 2006), but this may have resulted from our use of anal sex as a defining criterion for sexual orientation, as opposed to including both anal and oral sex as sufficient conditions.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Jeffries and Dodge (2007), however, using a probabilistic sample from the National Survey of Family Growth, discovered that bisexually active men actually reported increased rates of condom use with female sexual partners and equal rates of condom use with male partners when compared to their heterosexual and homosexual counterparts. While the subset of bisexually active men in the sample was small (61/3703, 1.7%) and Black men comprised only 16% of the 61 bisexually active men (n = 10), a couple of important points emerge from Jeffries and Dodge's analysis: First, when using probabilistic methods, the percentage of reportedly bisexually active men among all men is actually quite low, a finding that is not new, but in stark contrast with the proportion of media attention paid to these men as the sole perpetrators of the HIV epidemic among Black women (Millett et al, 2005).…”
Section: Identity Disclosure and Sexual Risk Behavior Among Behaviomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unlike openly gay men, they often refrain from disclosing their same-sex attractions and behaviours (Dodge et al in press) and few may identify as gay (Jeffries and Dodge, 2007). Bisexual men's behaviours, therefore, often remain unknown within their religious communities.…”
Section: Why Focus On Bisexual Black Men?mentioning
confidence: 99%