2015
DOI: 10.5334/jeps.de
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Male and Female Differences in Nonconscious Mimicry: A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, it is difficult to assess whether the scores reflected an increase, a decrease or no change in participants' emotional responses, which makes the interpretation of the effects of the senders' traits on these responses less straightforward. Second, although previous research on gender effects in emotional contagion and mimicry is highly inconclusive (for a review, see Lehane, 2015), we did not test any gender effects in the current study because the samples were too small and the number of men in these samples was low. However, given that some studies suggest that sensitivity to social and emotional information may differ across genders (for a review, see Fischer et al, 2018), testing the role of the receivers gender in emotional contagion and mimicry would be an important extension of the current findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…As a result, it is difficult to assess whether the scores reflected an increase, a decrease or no change in participants' emotional responses, which makes the interpretation of the effects of the senders' traits on these responses less straightforward. Second, although previous research on gender effects in emotional contagion and mimicry is highly inconclusive (for a review, see Lehane, 2015), we did not test any gender effects in the current study because the samples were too small and the number of men in these samples was low. However, given that some studies suggest that sensitivity to social and emotional information may differ across genders (for a review, see Fischer et al, 2018), testing the role of the receivers gender in emotional contagion and mimicry would be an important extension of the current findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%