2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ics.2005.12.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MALDI-TOF MS analysis of Y-SNPs in ancient samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contamination of OC in archaeological bone is considered less of a problem than in the case of aDNA because: (i) OC is only found in bone and allochthanous OC cannot therefore be ''introduced'' by microbial contamination or sample handling; (ii) OC has a unique identifiable mass (bovine OC M þ H þ has m/z 5721), and thus species identification depends on m/z measurement, in a similar manner to the authentication of expected DNA fragment masses in forensic testing (Petkovski et al, 2005) and aDNA research (Petkovski et al, 2006); and (iii) the OC is not being amplified before analysis, whereas small amounts of contaminating DNA can potentially become much more abundant than the target DNA after amplification. In addition to this, even with the sensitive instrumentation used here, OC is no longer detectable if its concentration falls by approximately four orders of magnitude from that in modern bone.…”
Section: Lesser Hedgehog Ucscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contamination of OC in archaeological bone is considered less of a problem than in the case of aDNA because: (i) OC is only found in bone and allochthanous OC cannot therefore be ''introduced'' by microbial contamination or sample handling; (ii) OC has a unique identifiable mass (bovine OC M þ H þ has m/z 5721), and thus species identification depends on m/z measurement, in a similar manner to the authentication of expected DNA fragment masses in forensic testing (Petkovski et al, 2005) and aDNA research (Petkovski et al, 2006); and (iii) the OC is not being amplified before analysis, whereas small amounts of contaminating DNA can potentially become much more abundant than the target DNA after amplification. In addition to this, even with the sensitive instrumentation used here, OC is no longer detectable if its concentration falls by approximately four orders of magnitude from that in modern bone.…”
Section: Lesser Hedgehog Ucscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, the SBE technique proved to be extremely sensitive, robust, and reliable (Sobrino, Brión, & Carracedo, ). By using the different SNP‐genotyping techniques, it was for example possible to successfully investigate Y‐chromosomal SNPs from degraded and ancient DNA material (Bouakaze, Keyser, Amory, Crubézy, & Ludes, ; Lessig et al, ; Petkovski, Keyser‐Tracqui, Crubézy, Hienne, & Ludes, ). SNP arrays are particularly known for being a high‐throughput method which requires only small amounts of DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%