2021
DOI: 10.1596/36906
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malawi COVID-19 Urban Cash Intervention Process Evaluation Report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, such measures are far‐fetched for a country like Malawi due to its financial constraints [ 22 ]. The Government of Malawi made efforts to cushion the economic shocks by extending its National Cash Transfer Programme to provide funds to cover 199,000 poor households in rural and urban areas at about MK 35,000.00 (approximately $45) per household, but the funds were only rated as adequate by 54% of the beneficiaries [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, such measures are far‐fetched for a country like Malawi due to its financial constraints [ 22 ]. The Government of Malawi made efforts to cushion the economic shocks by extending its National Cash Transfer Programme to provide funds to cover 199,000 poor households in rural and urban areas at about MK 35,000.00 (approximately $45) per household, but the funds were only rated as adequate by 54% of the beneficiaries [ 23 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Malawi COVID-19 Urban Cash Intervention was implemented, none of our study participants had access to it because it took place between April and June of 2020, prior to the start of the study. Our findings offer evidence that can be used to design future support for people affected by pandemics [ 21 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Malawi implemented the Malawi COVID-19 Urban Cash Intervention, none of our participants accessed it because it occurred between April to June of 2020 before the commencement of the study. However, it provides lessons to develop more support from this exercise that provided a minimum wage equivalent bill at the time and was only done for three months [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%