2015
DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Malaria diagnosis for malaria elimination

Abstract: Microscopy and rapid diagnostic tests provide effective surveillance for malaria control. Strategies that detect a reservoir of submicroscopic infection must be developed and standardized to guide malaria elimination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
76
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
2
76
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to their cost and relative complexity, the WHO and malaria diagnostic community in general understandably do not consider NAATs-including PCRs-a viable alternative for routine diagnostics in most countries [50]. However, while experts are debating the clinical utility of detecting subclinical malaria infections [20,51,52], detection of low density parasitaemia in asymptomatic patients by DNA-based diagnostics offers significant epidemiological value, particularly if coupled with strategic elimination efforts; detecting subclinical infections allows more targeted and effective interventions [53]. Furthermore, tracking of the emergence and spread of anti-malarial drug resistance mutations and strains carrying these determinants can only be performed using the specificity inherent within nucleic acid-based technology [50,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to their cost and relative complexity, the WHO and malaria diagnostic community in general understandably do not consider NAATs-including PCRs-a viable alternative for routine diagnostics in most countries [50]. However, while experts are debating the clinical utility of detecting subclinical malaria infections [20,51,52], detection of low density parasitaemia in asymptomatic patients by DNA-based diagnostics offers significant epidemiological value, particularly if coupled with strategic elimination efforts; detecting subclinical infections allows more targeted and effective interventions [53]. Furthermore, tracking of the emergence and spread of anti-malarial drug resistance mutations and strains carrying these determinants can only be performed using the specificity inherent within nucleic acid-based technology [50,54].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limit of detection (LOD) for PCR is typically 1-5 parasites/µL [13][14][15][16][17] compared to 50-500 parasites/µL for microscopy [13,14,18] and more than 100 parasites/µL for RDT's [14,19]. Depending on the assay, PCR can be used for accurate species identification, detection of mixed infections, and parasite density estimation [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, the diagnosis of malaria is carried out by inspecting the Giemsa/Leishman stained blood smears under a bright field microscope. Though there are other methods such as antigen‐based rapid diagnostic tests and the use of the polymerase chain reaction to detect the parasite's DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid), microscopic examination remains as the gold standard for the diagnosis of malaria due to the low‐cost and widespread acceptance. However, the manual examination of the slides is cumbersome and demands highly experienced clinicians.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of different diagnostic tools to detect infections34, the severity of clinical symptoms56, and transmission potential78 are all closely related to parasite densities. Parasite densities also show pronounced age patterns, reflecting lifetime exposure and naturally acquired immunity on a population level7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%