Malaria Control and Elimination in Sri Lanka: Documenting Progress and Success Factors in a Conflict Setting

Abstract

BackgroundSri Lanka has a long history of malaria control, and over the past decade has had dramatic declines in cases amid a national conflict. A case study of Sri Lanka's malaria programme was conducted to characterize the programme and explain recent progress.MethodsThe case study employed qualitative and quantitative methods. Data were collected from published and grey literature, district-level and national records, and thirty-three key informant interviews. Expenditures in two districts for two years – 2004 and 2009 – were compiled.FindingsMalaria incidence in Sri Lanka has declined by 99.9% since 1999. During this time, there were increases in the proportion of malaria infections due to Plasmodium vivax, and the proportion of infections occurring in adult males. Indoor residual spraying and distribution of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets have likely contributed to the low transmission. Entomological surveillance was maintained. A strong passive case detection system captures infections and active case detection was introduced. When comparing conflict and non-conflict districts, vector control and surveillance measures were maintained in conflict areas, often with higher coverage reported in conflict districts. One of two districts in the study reported a 48% decline in malaria programme expenditure per person at risk from 2004 to 2009. The other district had stable malaria spending.Conclusions/SignificanceMalaria is now at low levels in Sri Lanka – 124 indigenous cases were found in 2011. The majority of infections occur in adult males and are due to P. vivax. Evidence-driven policy and an ability to adapt to new circumstances contributed to this decline. Malaria interventions were maintained in the conflict districts despite an ongoing war. Sri Lanka has set a goal of eliminating malaria by the end of 2014. Early identification and treatment of infections, especially imported ones, together with effective surveillance and response, will be critical to achieving this goal.

Successful malaria elimination in the Ecuador–Peru border region: epidemiology and lessons learned

“…The findings presented here reflect the consensus from those meetings, as was done in similar studies [4, 5]. Findings are supported by a review of epidemiologic records provided by the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Ministries of Health (MoH), climate information provided by the National Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology of Ecuador (INAMHI) and the National Meteorology and Hydrology Service of Peru (SENAMHI), national policy documentation, and an exhaustive literature review [6] in Google Scholar, PubMed, the WHO Library (WHOLIS), the Global Fund Library and PAHO, using the search terms “ “Ecuador” or “Peru” or “Latin America” and “malaria” or “paludismo” and “elimination” or “prevention” or “control” or “treatment” or “diagnosis” or “ plasmodium falciparum ” or “ plasmodium vivax .” Published academic papers and grey literature in both English and Spanish were included in the analysis. This study contributes to an ongoing collaboration with the Ecuadorian Ministry of Health to strengthen the surveillance of endemic and emerging febrile vector-borne diseases in the region.…”

Host-vector interaction in dengue: a simple mathematical model

“…Historically, Sri Lanka has been successful in controlling and also eliminating infectious diseases [3][4][5]. In the challenging case of dengue, attacking the problem from every angle is essential.…”

“…In the absence of an effective vaccine or a curative antiviral drug, the only way of mitigating the spread of this disease is mosquito eradication and adoption of precautionary measures to minimize the cyclical transfer of the virus [1,2]. Such programs, carefully designed, based on the epidemiology of infection have been successful in combatting the spread of mosquito borne diseases [3][4][5]. In this context, mathematical models that quantitatively depict the epidemiology of the system, insightfully assist the optimization of control strategies [6][7][8].…”

Malaria in India: The Need for New Targets for Diagnosis and Detection of Plasmodium vivax

“…[2] Sri Lanka, which was declared malaria free in 2016, is a success story in the South Asia region. [3] The Indian government, too, supports this initiative with the publication of a roadmap to malaria elimination by 2030. It is generally agreed that elimination of malaria from a country will have positive outcomes for health, quality of life, and alleviation of poverty.…”