2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2008.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maladie d’Erdheim-Chester cérébrale avec double lésion pseudotumorale et ischémique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, three of these 5 observations are questionable. In the case of Amezyane et al [ 11 ] a focal stroke was discovered on brain MRI, but was probably asymptomatic and did not explain the neurological deficit (due to a brain pseudonodular lesion of ECD); in the case of Mergancova et al, [ 14 ] there were incomplete criteria of ECD; finally, Mélé et al [ 21 ] described a patient with mixed histiocytosis (with both Langerhans and non-Langerhans forms in the same patient). Interestingly, in the other cases (as in the case of Mergancova et al [ 14 ] ), vascular involvement (periarterial infiltration and sometimes stenosis) was observed in the supra-aortic arteries, whereas patients had no cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, three of these 5 observations are questionable. In the case of Amezyane et al [ 11 ] a focal stroke was discovered on brain MRI, but was probably asymptomatic and did not explain the neurological deficit (due to a brain pseudonodular lesion of ECD); in the case of Mergancova et al, [ 14 ] there were incomplete criteria of ECD; finally, Mélé et al [ 21 ] described a patient with mixed histiocytosis (with both Langerhans and non-Langerhans forms in the same patient). Interestingly, in the other cases (as in the case of Mergancova et al [ 14 ] ), vascular involvement (periarterial infiltration and sometimes stenosis) was observed in the supra-aortic arteries, whereas patients had no cardiovascular risk factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%