2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maladaptive Avoidance Learning in the Orbitofrontal Cortex in Adolescents With Major Depression

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by previous studies (Putkinen et al, 2021; Willinger et al, 2021), a full connectivity model (‘full’ model) was specified for each subject for DCM analysis, which included three sets of parameters: effective intrinsic connections between the three regions and their self-connections (matrix A); modulatory effects of SON on all connections between regions and self-connections (matrix B); and driving inputs (using all four auditory stimuli: SON, FN, UN, SONREV) into the left primary auditory cortex (matrix C) (Zeidman et al, 2019a). Specifically, the self-connection of Matrices A and B reflected the self-inhibition in each region, i.e., their gain or sensitivity to driving inputs (Zeidman et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As suggested by previous studies (Putkinen et al, 2021; Willinger et al, 2021), a full connectivity model (‘full’ model) was specified for each subject for DCM analysis, which included three sets of parameters: effective intrinsic connections between the three regions and their self-connections (matrix A); modulatory effects of SON on all connections between regions and self-connections (matrix B); and driving inputs (using all four auditory stimuli: SON, FN, UN, SONREV) into the left primary auditory cortex (matrix C) (Zeidman et al, 2019a). Specifically, the self-connection of Matrices A and B reflected the self-inhibition in each region, i.e., their gain or sensitivity to driving inputs (Zeidman et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As suggested by previous studies (Putkinen et al, 2021 ; Willinger et al, 2021 ), a full connectivity model ('full' model) was specified for each subject for DCM analysis, which included three sets of parameters: effective intrinsic connections between the three regions and their self‐connections (matrix A); modulatory effects of SON on all connections between regions and self‐connections (matrix B); and driving inputs (using all four auditory stimuli: SON, FN, UN, SONREV) into the left primary auditory cortex (matrix C) (Zeidman, Jafarian, Corbin, et al, 2019 ). Specifically, the self‐connection of Matrices A and B reflected the self‐inhibition in each region, that is, their gain or sensitivity to driving inputs (Zeidman, Jafarian, Corbin, et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…However, those with a diagnosis of MDD recorded either no or attenuated change in Hb activation following exposure to the same negative stimuli (95, 96). Similarly, in an error prediction learning task, adolescents with MDD exhibited a reduction in negative related signalling in the Hb when compared to controls (98). Moreover, the reduction in loss-related prediction error correlated with anhedonia symptom severity 98).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%