2003
DOI: 10.1515/apeiron.2003.36.2.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making Time Aristotle's Way

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another logical possibility is that McGinnis 2003;Coope 2005: Roark 2011and Sentesy (2018) were wrong to reject verificationism as an adequate description of Aristotle's account of time. Such an argument would depend on a strong intervention in the text to the effect that when Aristotle describes the changing thing as unifying and dividing, he is only speaking of how it displays features of a pre-existing continuity to a soul.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another logical possibility is that McGinnis 2003;Coope 2005: Roark 2011and Sentesy (2018) were wrong to reject verificationism as an adequate description of Aristotle's account of time. Such an argument would depend on a strong intervention in the text to the effect that when Aristotle describes the changing thing as unifying and dividing, he is only speaking of how it displays features of a pre-existing continuity to a soul.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet Aristotle would reply that the potency to be divided is always individual: there is no collective capacity to be infinitely divided, there is only the capacity to be divided again. 9 For example,McGinnis 2003, andSentesy 2018.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%