2014
DOI: 10.5465/amj.2012.0585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Most of Where You Are: Geography, Networks, and Innovation in Organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
127
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
5
127
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Proximity, in the network perspective, has typically been conceptualised as the geographical distance between two organisations (e.g. Cassi & Plunket, 2013;Funk, 2014). Knoben and Oerlemans (2006) also point to six forms of non-spatial proximity, including institutional proximity and technological proximity, but these concepts that capture the similarity between organisations are not directly relevant to issues associated with the physical work environment.…”
Section: Current Debates On Open-plan Officesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Proximity, in the network perspective, has typically been conceptualised as the geographical distance between two organisations (e.g. Cassi & Plunket, 2013;Funk, 2014). Knoben and Oerlemans (2006) also point to six forms of non-spatial proximity, including institutional proximity and technological proximity, but these concepts that capture the similarity between organisations are not directly relevant to issues associated with the physical work environment.…”
Section: Current Debates On Open-plan Officesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cassi & Plunket, 2013;Funk, 2014;Hallen, Katila, & Rosenberger, 2014). Few network researchers appear to have gone inside buildings to examine the implications of other physical variables, such as layout, barriers, or office size, on the development of collaborative networks.…”
Section: Current Debates On Open-plan Officesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Patenting refers to a firm's activities to codify knowledge [52,53], and thus it can be measured with the number of patents that are filed to USPTO in a given year [49,50]. On the other hand, prior patents are previously codified knowledge, and they are represented by the cumulative number of patents that were previously filed to USPTO until a given year.…”
Section: Independent Variablementioning
confidence: 99%