2018
DOI: 10.1080/01442872.2018.1434874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the most of the frame: developing the analytical potential of frame analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, our analysis also shows that sport advocates who are diligent in their use of frame extension may simultaneously generate effects that are independent of their advocacy "success" (cf. Björnehed & Eriksson, 2018;Eriksson, 2011). It was indeed the exact elements perceived as key components of effective claims (see Table 2) that simultaneously foreshadowed transformative effects (RQ2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, our analysis also shows that sport advocates who are diligent in their use of frame extension may simultaneously generate effects that are independent of their advocacy "success" (cf. Björnehed & Eriksson, 2018;Eriksson, 2011). It was indeed the exact elements perceived as key components of effective claims (see Table 2) that simultaneously foreshadowed transformative effects (RQ2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of this, RSFs' efforts to ensure claim credibility (see Table 2) may lead to a particular type of over commitment characterized by "overselling" the extent to which clubs are ready, willing, and able to live up to the promises made in advocacy claims. Framing strategies thus narrow advocates' room for maneuver in terms of the structure of future claims (Björnehed & Eriksson, 2018;Eriksson, 2011). The claims so carefully constructed by the sport advocates under study, therefore, have the propensity to become institutionalized over time, rendering them hard to retract or replace without losing credibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Björnehed and Erikson (2018) define frame analysis as "an analytical approach within the constructionist tradition that addresses not only the construction of meaning but also the roles of actors in such processes" (p. 109). The "construction of meaning" and "the roles of actors" in Björnehed and Erikson's (2018) definition bring out distinct choices for the use of frame analysis. Analysts can consider how meanings are constructed, the meanings enacted in role performances, or the behaviours involved in constructing meaning.…”
Section: Frame Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frame analysis, which may be described in the simplest terms as a particular analytical approach within the constructivist tradition, spans a number of disciplines and various levels of analysis (for an overview see van Hulst and Yanow 2016;Björnehed and Erikson 2018). It complements feminist institutionalism by making it possible to focus on actors' perceptions more explicitly.…”
Section: Frame Analysis From An Institutional Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%