Teaching Gender and Sex in Contemporary America 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-30364-2_27
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Invisible Visible: Shining a Light on Gender and Sexuality in Courses Primarily Focused on Other Topics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because students process new information and tolerate openness and selfexploration differently (e.g., Caviness, Giuffre, & Wasley-Valdez, 2016;Rios, Stewart, & Winter, 2010), I offer them a variety of ways to demonstrate individualized strengths: (a) writing a summary (no more than 30 words) capturing each main point in every reading assignment; (b) leading a class discussion individually and in small groups (e.g., Wentling, 2016) on a chosen theorist, using PowerPoint-like materials; (c) participating in an open critique of each theorist during student-led discussions (e.g., Burke & Trumpy, 2016); and (d) writing a final paper that addresses one contemporary controversy in personality research and theory through a social constructivist lens.…”
Section: Course Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because students process new information and tolerate openness and selfexploration differently (e.g., Caviness, Giuffre, & Wasley-Valdez, 2016;Rios, Stewart, & Winter, 2010), I offer them a variety of ways to demonstrate individualized strengths: (a) writing a summary (no more than 30 words) capturing each main point in every reading assignment; (b) leading a class discussion individually and in small groups (e.g., Wentling, 2016) on a chosen theorist, using PowerPoint-like materials; (c) participating in an open critique of each theorist during student-led discussions (e.g., Burke & Trumpy, 2016); and (d) writing a final paper that addresses one contemporary controversy in personality research and theory through a social constructivist lens.…”
Section: Course Structurementioning
confidence: 99%