Shame 4.0 2021
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59527-2_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the Cut: Mass Media and the Growing Desire for Genital Cosmetic Surgery by Young Women and Girls

Abstract: Women and girls have long been confronted with unrealistic, unattainable body image norms. Additionally, the 'ideal feminine' body has been subject to constant change over the last centuries and decades. With the proliferation of the internet, women and girls are continuously exposed to advice from heteronormative discourses of womanhood. Demand for cosmetic surgery has dramatically increased and is still expanding. Recently, women's and girls' awareness has shifted towards how they should 'improve' the aesthe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend has led experts from different fields to raise concerns about societal influences [4][5][6][7]-such as the medicalisation of sexuality, the regulative influence of public health practices, neoliberal imperatives around self-improvement, or negative sociocultural representations of female bodies/genitalia-and psychological vulnerabilities [8] amplifying the perceived urgency for and normalisation of surgery in women, especially with regard to online contents [9][10][11], as well as about the lack of data on surgery outcomes and side effects [12,13], and regulations for providers [13]. Moreover, the (in some countries legally underpinned) distinction between practices known as 'female genital cutting/mutilation' (FGC/M) and FGCS, and the framing of the former as harmful and coercive and the latter as not have been ethically challenged [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trend has led experts from different fields to raise concerns about societal influences [4][5][6][7]-such as the medicalisation of sexuality, the regulative influence of public health practices, neoliberal imperatives around self-improvement, or negative sociocultural representations of female bodies/genitalia-and psychological vulnerabilities [8] amplifying the perceived urgency for and normalisation of surgery in women, especially with regard to online contents [9][10][11], as well as about the lack of data on surgery outcomes and side effects [12,13], and regulations for providers [13]. Moreover, the (in some countries legally underpinned) distinction between practices known as 'female genital cutting/mutilation' (FGC/M) and FGCS, and the framing of the former as harmful and coercive and the latter as not have been ethically challenged [14][15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ich beschränke mich hier auf die Nennung einiger weniger, einschlägiger, neuerer Publikationen, über die man einen guten Überblick zum Stand der Diskussion und zu weiter führender Literatur erhält: Borkenhagen (2019), Creighton & Liao (2019), Koops et al (2021). Erwähnen möchte ich an dieser Stelle auch meine eigene, zusammen mit Regula Umbricht durchgeführte empirische Studie, in der wir mittels einer OnlineUmfrage die Zunahme chirurgischer Eingriffe am äusseren weiblichen Genitale in der Schweiz zwischen 1992 und 2012 untersuchten, und zwar differenziert nach funktionalen, psychischen und ästhetischen Gründen.…”
unclassified