2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1084952102001039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Making the connection: retinal axon guidance in the zebrafish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1C-F). These axon phenotypes are similar to, but less severe than, those seen in other ipsilateral class mutants such as yot(gli2) and dtr(gli1) (Barresi et al, 2005;Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002;Karlstrom et al, 1996).…”
Section: Axon Guidance and Forebrain Patterning Defects In Uml Mutantssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…1C-F). These axon phenotypes are similar to, but less severe than, those seen in other ipsilateral class mutants such as yot(gli2) and dtr(gli1) (Barresi et al, 2005;Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002;Karlstrom et al, 1996).…”
Section: Axon Guidance and Forebrain Patterning Defects In Uml Mutantssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…In zebrafish mutants in which components of the Hh signalling pathway are affected, RGC axons fail to cross the midline (Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002). Detailed analysis of these mutants and the treatment of wild-type zebrafish embryos with cyclopamine demonstrated that axon guidance defects were secondary to the Shh-mediated specification of midline glial cells as well as to the control of Slit expression (Barresi et al, 2005;Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002), a potent repellent for RGC axons (Erskine et al, 2000;Niclou et al, 2000;Ringstedt et al, 2000).…”
Section: C-rgc Axon Growth Depends On Two Shh Sources: the Rgc And Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed analysis of these mutants and the treatment of wild-type zebrafish embryos with cyclopamine demonstrated that axon guidance defects were secondary to the Shh-mediated specification of midline glial cells as well as to the control of Slit expression (Barresi et al, 2005;Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002), a potent repellent for RGC axons (Erskine et al, 2000;Niclou et al, 2000;Ringstedt et al, 2000). Although in our experiments anti-Shh-producing cells were injected when Shh expression is already downregulated and no longer needed in the preoptic area (Manning et al, 2006;Trousse et al, 2001), we cannot entirely exclude the possibility that some of the observed defects might be secondary to subtle patterning alterations.…”
Section: C-rgc Axon Growth Depends On Two Shh Sources: the Rgc And Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This large-scale screen uncovered 114 mutations, in about 35 genes, disrupting either the pathfinding of axons from the eye to the tectum or the retinotopic map. Although some of the more specific mutations, such as gna, woe and nev, still await molecular identification, most of the genes have now been cloned (Culverwell and Karlstrom, 2002). Unsurprisingly, retinotectal pathfinding was found to depend on proper brain patterning (Hedgehog signaling, syu, igu, con, dtr, uml and yot; Nodal signaling, cyc; homeodomain transcription factors, noi) and on components of the extracellular matrix (bal, gpy and sly).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%